Legis Daily

Investor Choice Act of 2026

USA119th CongressHR-9462| House 
| Updated: 6/25/2026
Bill Foster

Bill Foster

Democratic Representative

Illinois

Cosponsors (1)
Nydia M. Velázquez (Democratic)

Financial Services Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This bill seeks to enhance investor protection by prohibiting mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements across the securities market. Congress finds that investor confidence relies on fair recourse, and mandatory arbitration clauses leverage the powerful advantages held by issuers, brokers, dealers, and investment advisers, severely restricting defrauded investors' ability to seek redress. The legislation aims to ensure investors are free to choose arbitration if they deem it best, or pursue remedies in court. Specifically, the bill amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit exchanges from listing securities if the issuer mandates arbitration for disputes with shareholders in their bylaws or contracts. It also makes it unlawful for brokers, dealers, funding portals, or municipal securities dealers to enter into agreements that mandate arbitration, restrict forum selection, or limit a customer's ability to pursue claims individually, representatively, or on a class action basis. Similar prohibitions are extended to investment advisers through amendments to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 , making it unlawful for them to impose such restrictions on their clients. Furthermore, the Securities Act of 1933 is amended to prevent securities from being registered if the issuer mandates arbitration for shareholder disputes. For agreements entered into before the bill's enactment, any prohibited provision is rendered void, unless arbitration was already initiated by any party on or before the enactment date. Generally, the amendments apply to any agreement entered into, modified, or extended after the date of enactment, reinforcing investor choice in dispute resolution.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-5336
Investor Choice Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-2620
Investor Choice Act of 2021

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-7168
Investor Choice Act of 2024
Jun 24, 2026

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-4937
Introduced in Senate
Jun 25, 2026
Introduced in House
Jun 25, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-5336
    Investor Choice Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-2620
    Investor Choice Act of 2021


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-7168
    Investor Choice Act of 2024


  • June 24, 2026

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-4937
    Introduced in Senate


  • June 25, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • June 25, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Finance and Financial Sector

Related Bills

  • S 119-4937: Investor Choice Act of 2026

Investor Choice Act of 2026

USA119th CongressHR-9462| House 
| Updated: 6/25/2026
This bill seeks to enhance investor protection by prohibiting mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements across the securities market. Congress finds that investor confidence relies on fair recourse, and mandatory arbitration clauses leverage the powerful advantages held by issuers, brokers, dealers, and investment advisers, severely restricting defrauded investors' ability to seek redress. The legislation aims to ensure investors are free to choose arbitration if they deem it best, or pursue remedies in court. Specifically, the bill amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit exchanges from listing securities if the issuer mandates arbitration for disputes with shareholders in their bylaws or contracts. It also makes it unlawful for brokers, dealers, funding portals, or municipal securities dealers to enter into agreements that mandate arbitration, restrict forum selection, or limit a customer's ability to pursue claims individually, representatively, or on a class action basis. Similar prohibitions are extended to investment advisers through amendments to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 , making it unlawful for them to impose such restrictions on their clients. Furthermore, the Securities Act of 1933 is amended to prevent securities from being registered if the issuer mandates arbitration for shareholder disputes. For agreements entered into before the bill's enactment, any prohibited provision is rendered void, unless arbitration was already initiated by any party on or before the enactment date. Generally, the amendments apply to any agreement entered into, modified, or extended after the date of enactment, reinforcing investor choice in dispute resolution.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-5336
Investor Choice Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-2620
Investor Choice Act of 2021

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-7168
Investor Choice Act of 2024
Jun 24, 2026

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-4937
Introduced in Senate
Jun 25, 2026
Introduced in House
Jun 25, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-5336
    Investor Choice Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-2620
    Investor Choice Act of 2021


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-7168
    Investor Choice Act of 2024


  • June 24, 2026

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-4937
    Introduced in Senate


  • June 25, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • June 25, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Bill Foster

Bill Foster

Democratic Representative

Illinois

Cosponsors (1)
Nydia M. Velázquez (Democratic)

Financial Services Committee

Finance and Financial Sector

Related Bills

  • S 119-4937: Investor Choice Act of 2026
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted