Legis Daily

Expressing that compelled political litmus tests used by public institutions to require individuals to identify with specific ideological views are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech and in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.

USA119th CongressHRES-947| House 
| Updated: 12/11/2025
Gregory F. Murphy

Gregory F. Murphy

Republican Representative

North Carolina

Education and Workforce Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' strong condemnation of public institutions of higher education that condition student admissions or faculty hiring, reappointment, or promotion on an individual's pledge of allegiance to or statement of personal support for or opposition to any political ideology. This specifically includes statements related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or similar topics. The resolution asserts that these actions constitute impermissible political litmus tests that are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech, and are in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. The resolution further discourages any institution from requesting or requiring such pledges or statements from applicants or faculty members. It cites Supreme Court precedents like Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Keyishian v. Board of Regents , which emphasize the importance of academic freedom and warn against casting a "pall of orthodoxy" over the classroom. The resolution highlights concerns that ideologically motivated DEI statement policies can penalize dissenting opinions and compel individuals to endorse specific beliefs, which is contrary to the First Amendment's prohibition against government-compelled speech.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HRES 118-282
Expressing that compelled political litmus tests used by public institutions to require individuals to identify with specific ideological views are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech and in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Dec 11, 2025
Submitted in House
Dec 11, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HRES 118-282
    Expressing that compelled political litmus tests used by public institutions to require individuals to identify with specific ideological views are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech and in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.


  • December 11, 2025
    Submitted in House


  • December 11, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Education

Expressing that compelled political litmus tests used by public institutions to require individuals to identify with specific ideological views are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech and in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.

USA119th CongressHRES-947| House 
| Updated: 12/11/2025
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' strong condemnation of public institutions of higher education that condition student admissions or faculty hiring, reappointment, or promotion on an individual's pledge of allegiance to or statement of personal support for or opposition to any political ideology. This specifically includes statements related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or similar topics. The resolution asserts that these actions constitute impermissible political litmus tests that are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech, and are in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. The resolution further discourages any institution from requesting or requiring such pledges or statements from applicants or faculty members. It cites Supreme Court precedents like Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Keyishian v. Board of Regents , which emphasize the importance of academic freedom and warn against casting a "pall of orthodoxy" over the classroom. The resolution highlights concerns that ideologically motivated DEI statement policies can penalize dissenting opinions and compel individuals to endorse specific beliefs, which is contrary to the First Amendment's prohibition against government-compelled speech.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HRES 118-282
Expressing that compelled political litmus tests used by public institutions to require individuals to identify with specific ideological views are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech and in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Dec 11, 2025
Submitted in House
Dec 11, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HRES 118-282
    Expressing that compelled political litmus tests used by public institutions to require individuals to identify with specific ideological views are directly at odds with the principles of academic freedom and free speech and in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.


  • December 11, 2025
    Submitted in House


  • December 11, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Gregory F. Murphy

Gregory F. Murphy

Republican Representative

North Carolina

Education and Workforce Committee

Education

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted