Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
This House Resolution sets forth the procedural framework for the consideration of several key legislative items. It allows for the immediate consideration of S.J. Res. 18 , which seeks to disapprove a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) rule concerning overdraft lending by very large financial institutions. Similarly, it enables consideration of S.J. Res. 28 , aimed at disapproving a CFPB rule defining larger participants in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications. For both joint resolutions, all points of order against their consideration and provisions are waived, and debate is limited to one hour, equally divided. The resolution also permits consideration of H.R. 1526 , a bill designed to amend title 28 of the United States Code to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, with a committee amendment considered adopted. Furthermore, it allows for the consideration of H.R. 22 , which proposes to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for federal election voter registration. For H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22, all points of order are waived, and debate is restricted to one hour, equally divided, with one motion to recommit allowed. Finally, the resolution formally adopts House Resolution 293 and lays House Resolution 164 on the table, concluding its procedural directives.
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).
House of RepresentativesLegislative rules and procedure
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
USA119th CongressHRES-294| House
| Updated: 4/8/2025
This House Resolution sets forth the procedural framework for the consideration of several key legislative items. It allows for the immediate consideration of S.J. Res. 18 , which seeks to disapprove a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) rule concerning overdraft lending by very large financial institutions. Similarly, it enables consideration of S.J. Res. 28 , aimed at disapproving a CFPB rule defining larger participants in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications. For both joint resolutions, all points of order against their consideration and provisions are waived, and debate is limited to one hour, equally divided. The resolution also permits consideration of H.R. 1526 , a bill designed to amend title 28 of the United States Code to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, with a committee amendment considered adopted. Furthermore, it allows for the consideration of H.R. 22 , which proposes to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for federal election voter registration. For H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22, all points of order are waived, and debate is restricted to one hour, equally divided, with one motion to recommit allowed. Finally, the resolution formally adopts House Resolution 293 and lays House Resolution 164 on the table, concluding its procedural directives.
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).