Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Certification Requirements, Labeling Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial Equipment"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 61) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing"; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 11) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to "Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources".
This resolution outlines the procedural rules for the House of Representatives to consider three distinct joint resolutions, each seeking to disapprove a federal agency rule under the Congressional Review Act. Specifically, it facilitates the consideration of H.J. Res. 42, which targets a Department of Energy rule concerning appliance energy conservation standards, and H.J. Res. 61, aimed at an Environmental Protection Agency rule on hazardous air pollutant emissions from rubber tire manufacturing. The resolution also sets the stage for S.J. Res. 11, which seeks to overturn a Bureau of Ocean Energy Management rule regarding the protection of marine archaeological resources. For all three joint resolutions, it waives points of order, mandates one hour of debate equally divided, and allows for one motion to recommit, thereby streamlining their path to a vote.
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 5.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-8, by Mr. Langworthy.
Reported in House
The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 42, H.J. Res. 61, and S.J. Res. 11 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 42 and H.J. Res. 61 and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 11.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H955-960)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 177.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 177, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H961-962)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 196 - 187 (Roll no. 56). (consideration: CR H961)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 5.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-8, by Mr. Langworthy.
Reported in House
The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 42, H.J. Res. 61, and S.J. Res. 11 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 42 and H.J. Res. 61 and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 11.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H955-960)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 177.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 177, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H961-962)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 196 - 187 (Roll no. 56). (consideration: CR H961)
House of RepresentativesLegislative rules and procedure
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Certification Requirements, Labeling Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial Equipment"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 61) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing"; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 11) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to "Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources".
USA119th CongressHRES-177| House
| Updated: 3/4/2025
This resolution outlines the procedural rules for the House of Representatives to consider three distinct joint resolutions, each seeking to disapprove a federal agency rule under the Congressional Review Act. Specifically, it facilitates the consideration of H.J. Res. 42, which targets a Department of Energy rule concerning appliance energy conservation standards, and H.J. Res. 61, aimed at an Environmental Protection Agency rule on hazardous air pollutant emissions from rubber tire manufacturing. The resolution also sets the stage for S.J. Res. 11, which seeks to overturn a Bureau of Ocean Energy Management rule regarding the protection of marine archaeological resources. For all three joint resolutions, it waives points of order, mandates one hour of debate equally divided, and allows for one motion to recommit, thereby streamlining their path to a vote.
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 5.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-8, by Mr. Langworthy.
Reported in House
The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 42, H.J. Res. 61, and S.J. Res. 11 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 42 and H.J. Res. 61 and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 11.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H955-960)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 177.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 177, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H961-962)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 196 - 187 (Roll no. 56). (consideration: CR H961)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 5.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-8, by Mr. Langworthy.
Reported in House
The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 42, H.J. Res. 61, and S.J. Res. 11 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 42 and H.J. Res. 61 and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 11.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H955-960)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 177.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 177, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H961-962)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 196 - 187 (Roll no. 56). (consideration: CR H961)