Legis Daily

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Department of Justice must comply with the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the Constitution by refusing to administratively settle the billions of dollars in legal claims filed against the United States by President Donald Trump.

USA119th CongressHRES-1185| House 
| Updated: 4/16/2026
Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Democratic Representative

Maryland

Cosponsors (28)
Becca Balint (Democratic)John Garamendi (Democratic)Jonathan L. Jackson (Democratic)Maxine Dexter (Democratic)J. Luis Correa (Democratic)Madeleine Dean (Democratic)Steve Cohen (Democratic)Dave Min (Democratic)Ted Lieu (Democratic)Jasmine Crockett (Democratic)Henry C. "Hank" Johnson (Democratic)Brendan F. Boyle (Democratic)Joaquin Castro (Democratic)Daniel S. Goldman (Democratic)Raja Krishnamoorthi (Democratic)Jerrold Nadler (Democratic)Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Democratic)Lucy McBath (Democratic)Betty McCollum (Democratic)Eleanor Holmes Norton (Democratic)Bonnie Watson Coleman (Democratic)Mary Gay Scanlon (Democratic)Joe Neguse (Democratic)Deborah K. Ross (Democratic)Zoe Lofgren (Democratic)Rashida Tlaib (Democratic)Kweisi Mfume (Democratic)Chellie Pingree (Democratic)

Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This House Resolution declares the sense of the House of Representatives that the Department of Justice (DOJ) must uphold the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. It specifically calls for the DOJ to reject any administrative settlement of the substantial legal claims filed against the United States by President Donald Trump. The resolution highlights that such settlements, if made by executive branch officials, would violate the constitutional prohibition against a President receiving additional emoluments from the government beyond their official compensation. The resolution cites a $10 billion lawsuit filed by President Trump against the Internal Revenue Service and $230 million in administrative claims under the Federal Torts Claims Act as examples of the claims in question. It argues that allowing the President's subordinates within the executive branch to administratively approve these payments would create an unacceptable conflict of interest, akin to being "a judge in his own cause." The resolution concludes that while President Trump retains the right to pursue damages in an independent Article III court, the Department of Justice and other federal agencies are expressly forbidden from administratively settling these lawsuits or making direct monetary payments to him outside of his official salary.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 16, 2026
Submitted in House
Apr 16, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • April 16, 2026
    Submitted in House


  • April 16, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Department of Justice must comply with the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the Constitution by refusing to administratively settle the billions of dollars in legal claims filed against the United States by President Donald Trump.

USA119th CongressHRES-1185| House 
| Updated: 4/16/2026
This House Resolution declares the sense of the House of Representatives that the Department of Justice (DOJ) must uphold the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. It specifically calls for the DOJ to reject any administrative settlement of the substantial legal claims filed against the United States by President Donald Trump. The resolution highlights that such settlements, if made by executive branch officials, would violate the constitutional prohibition against a President receiving additional emoluments from the government beyond their official compensation. The resolution cites a $10 billion lawsuit filed by President Trump against the Internal Revenue Service and $230 million in administrative claims under the Federal Torts Claims Act as examples of the claims in question. It argues that allowing the President's subordinates within the executive branch to administratively approve these payments would create an unacceptable conflict of interest, akin to being "a judge in his own cause." The resolution concludes that while President Trump retains the right to pursue damages in an independent Article III court, the Department of Justice and other federal agencies are expressly forbidden from administratively settling these lawsuits or making direct monetary payments to him outside of his official salary.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 16, 2026
Submitted in House
Apr 16, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • April 16, 2026
    Submitted in House


  • April 16, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin

Democratic Representative

Maryland

Cosponsors (28)
Becca Balint (Democratic)John Garamendi (Democratic)Jonathan L. Jackson (Democratic)Maxine Dexter (Democratic)J. Luis Correa (Democratic)Madeleine Dean (Democratic)Steve Cohen (Democratic)Dave Min (Democratic)Ted Lieu (Democratic)Jasmine Crockett (Democratic)Henry C. "Hank" Johnson (Democratic)Brendan F. Boyle (Democratic)Joaquin Castro (Democratic)Daniel S. Goldman (Democratic)Raja Krishnamoorthi (Democratic)Jerrold Nadler (Democratic)Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Democratic)Lucy McBath (Democratic)Betty McCollum (Democratic)Eleanor Holmes Norton (Democratic)Bonnie Watson Coleman (Democratic)Mary Gay Scanlon (Democratic)Joe Neguse (Democratic)Deborah K. Ross (Democratic)Zoe Lofgren (Democratic)Rashida Tlaib (Democratic)Kweisi Mfume (Democratic)Chellie Pingree (Democratic)

Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted