This House Resolution expresses the sense that the structure and governance of the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) postseason should prioritize broad-based athletic opportunity , financial sustainability for college athletics, and competitive balance . It notes that the current College Football Playoff (CFP) system is comparatively narrow, concentrating championship access and revenue among a limited number of institutions, which can lead to financial pressures and anticompetitive effects for many programs. The resolution emphasizes that postseason design and revenue structures should be reformed where they entrench advantages for a select few schools and erode competitive balance. The resolution advocates for serious consideration of innovative proposals, such as those advanced by Coach Mike Leach , which suggest expanding postseason participation to a broad, bracketed format. These proposals, which could include a 16-, 32-, or 64-team bracket, aim to mitigate anticompetitive effects and provide more teams with a meaningful late-season path. Such reforms, paired with responsible season design and a more unified approach to media rights, could create a more valuable national product, distribute benefits more widely, and protect opportunity and fair competition in major college football, aligning FBS with other NCAA divisions that successfully use broad-access tournaments.