This bill, titled the "Epstein Files Transparency Act II," aims to strengthen the enforcement provisions of the original Act. It empowers state attorneys general , district attorneys, and other authorized state officers to initiate legal actions on behalf of their states or residents against the U.S. Attorney General. These actions can be brought for unlawful withholding, redaction, or delay of records related to the Epstein investigation, seeking declaratory relief, injunctive relief, monetary relief, and attorney's fees. The legislation also allows victims to bring similar actions against the U.S. Attorney General for non-compliance. Courts are mandated to expedite the disposition of these civil actions to the greatest extent practicable. For the purpose of these lawsuits, harm to a state or its residents is broadly defined to include investigative harm, harassment, informational injury, and financial harm. A key provision explicitly states that Touhy regulations (28 CFR §§ 16.21-16.29) shall not apply to requests for records under this Act, preventing federal agencies from using them to withhold information. Victims are granted a right to full, unredacted access to records that identify or relate to them, with safeguards to protect the personally identifiable information of other victims. For state investigations or judicial proceedings, the U.S. Attorney General must provide full, unredacted access to records that might otherwise be withheld from public view. These records can be used by state officials in their investigations and court proceedings, subject to protective orders to safeguard victims' personal information. Similarly, state officials are granted access to classified materials for review in secure facilities, and the Attorney General cannot refuse access solely based on classification. The bill also enhances Congressional access , requiring the Attorney General to provide full, unredacted access to records to any Member of Congress within seven days of a written request. If non-compliance is alleged, the Attorney General must remedy the violation or provide a written justification within 30 days. Members of Congress can also sue the Attorney General for non-compliance, seeking various forms of relief. Furthermore, the bill establishes penalties for federal officials, including the Attorney General and FBI Director, who conceal, remove, destroy, falsify, or make false statements concerning records required under the Act. These actions can lead to fines or imprisonment under existing federal statutes. The definition of a "victim" is clarified, encompassing individuals directly harmed by the criminal conduct involving Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, identified by federal agencies, associated with investigative records, or who submit sworn declarations of harm, while excluding those whose involvement originated from participation in the criminal conduct unless they were also trafficked or abused. Finally, the bill clarifies that common law privileges, such as deliberative process, attorney-client, attorney work-product, or law enforcement privileges, cannot be invoked to withhold or redact records, except as expressly permitted by the Act. It also amends the list of permitted withholdings, removing one category from the original legislation.
This bill, titled the "Epstein Files Transparency Act II," aims to strengthen the enforcement provisions of the original Act. It empowers state attorneys general , district attorneys, and other authorized state officers to initiate legal actions on behalf of their states or residents against the U.S. Attorney General. These actions can be brought for unlawful withholding, redaction, or delay of records related to the Epstein investigation, seeking declaratory relief, injunctive relief, monetary relief, and attorney's fees. The legislation also allows victims to bring similar actions against the U.S. Attorney General for non-compliance. Courts are mandated to expedite the disposition of these civil actions to the greatest extent practicable. For the purpose of these lawsuits, harm to a state or its residents is broadly defined to include investigative harm, harassment, informational injury, and financial harm. A key provision explicitly states that Touhy regulations (28 CFR §§ 16.21-16.29) shall not apply to requests for records under this Act, preventing federal agencies from using them to withhold information. Victims are granted a right to full, unredacted access to records that identify or relate to them, with safeguards to protect the personally identifiable information of other victims. For state investigations or judicial proceedings, the U.S. Attorney General must provide full, unredacted access to records that might otherwise be withheld from public view. These records can be used by state officials in their investigations and court proceedings, subject to protective orders to safeguard victims' personal information. Similarly, state officials are granted access to classified materials for review in secure facilities, and the Attorney General cannot refuse access solely based on classification. The bill also enhances Congressional access , requiring the Attorney General to provide full, unredacted access to records to any Member of Congress within seven days of a written request. If non-compliance is alleged, the Attorney General must remedy the violation or provide a written justification within 30 days. Members of Congress can also sue the Attorney General for non-compliance, seeking various forms of relief. Furthermore, the bill establishes penalties for federal officials, including the Attorney General and FBI Director, who conceal, remove, destroy, falsify, or make false statements concerning records required under the Act. These actions can lead to fines or imprisonment under existing federal statutes. The definition of a "victim" is clarified, encompassing individuals directly harmed by the criminal conduct involving Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, identified by federal agencies, associated with investigative records, or who submit sworn declarations of harm, while excluding those whose involvement originated from participation in the criminal conduct unless they were also trafficked or abused. Finally, the bill clarifies that common law privileges, such as deliberative process, attorney-client, attorney work-product, or law enforcement privileges, cannot be invoked to withhold or redact records, except as expressly permitted by the Act. It also amends the list of permitted withholdings, removing one category from the original legislation.