This legislative proposal, titled the "Democracy Without Intimidation Act," aims to reinforce the separation of military forces from civilian electoral processes. Its primary provision amends 18 U.S.C. 592, eliminating the exception that previously allowed the use of troops at polling places if deemed necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, thereby establishing an absolute prohibition on military presence at polls. The bill also strengthens enforcement mechanisms for election-related offenses. It explicitly requires United States attorneys, marshals, and magistrate judges to institute prosecutions against individuals violating laws concerning election interference, including the prohibition on troops at polls. To facilitate this, district courts are mandated to increase the number of United States magistrate judges, ensuring a speedy process for arresting and examining offenders. A significant new provision is the creation of a private right of action , allowing any individual harmed by a violation of the troop-at-polls prohibition to file a civil lawsuit for injunctive relief. This action can be brought against covered persons , defined as Senior Executive Service members or political appointees within Federal law enforcement agencies, with appeals expedited directly to the Supreme Court.
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Crime and Law Enforcement
Democracy Without Intimidation Act
USA119th CongressHR-8825| House
| Updated: 5/14/2026
This legislative proposal, titled the "Democracy Without Intimidation Act," aims to reinforce the separation of military forces from civilian electoral processes. Its primary provision amends 18 U.S.C. 592, eliminating the exception that previously allowed the use of troops at polling places if deemed necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, thereby establishing an absolute prohibition on military presence at polls. The bill also strengthens enforcement mechanisms for election-related offenses. It explicitly requires United States attorneys, marshals, and magistrate judges to institute prosecutions against individuals violating laws concerning election interference, including the prohibition on troops at polls. To facilitate this, district courts are mandated to increase the number of United States magistrate judges, ensuring a speedy process for arresting and examining offenders. A significant new provision is the creation of a private right of action , allowing any individual harmed by a violation of the troop-at-polls prohibition to file a civil lawsuit for injunctive relief. This action can be brought against covered persons , defined as Senior Executive Service members or political appointees within Federal law enforcement agencies, with appeals expedited directly to the Supreme Court.