Legis Daily

Monitor Accountability Act

USA119th CongressHR-8365| House 
| Updated: 5/18/2026
Andy Biggs

Andy Biggs

Republican Representative

Arizona

Cosponsors (2)
Troy E. Nehls (Republican)Russell Fry (Republican)

Judiciary Committee, Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
The Monitor Accountability Act of 2026 directs the Administrator of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to establish comprehensive rules for district courts appointing monitors to oversee state or local government conduct. These conditions, to be implemented within 90 days, aim to enhance transparency and accountability in the monitoring process. Key provisions include strict limitations on monitor fees , requiring adherence to maximum rates and encouraging pro bono or reduced-rate services. Monitors will be restricted to serving only one monitorship at a time , with a maximum term of five years , and cannot be reappointed under the same court order; subsequent monitors for the same order must also be from a different employer. To ensure public oversight, the bill mandates public notice and comment before a monitor's appointment, and requires monitors to submit annual public accountings of services and fees. Furthermore, any monitorship in effect for six years will result in the case being transferred to a different judge , and existing long-term monitorships are subject to these new appointment and transfer rules.

Bill Text Versions

View Text
3 versions available

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 20, 2026
Introduced in House
Apr 20, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 22, 2026
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Apr 22, 2026
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 11.
May 4, 2026
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 551.
May 4, 2026
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635.
May 12, 2026
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
May 14, 2026
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275.
May 14, 2026
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3480-3486)
May 14, 2026
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
May 14, 2026
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8365.
May 14, 2026
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
May 14, 2026
Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3486)
May 14, 2026
Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary.
May 14, 2026
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
May 14, 2026
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8365, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Boyle (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
May 14, 2026
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3507-3509)
May 14, 2026
Considered as unfinished business.
May 14, 2026
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 172).
View Vote
May 14, 2026
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480)
View Vote
May 14, 2026
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
May 18, 2026
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  • April 20, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • April 20, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • April 22, 2026
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • April 22, 2026
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 11.


  • May 4, 2026
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 551.


  • May 4, 2026
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635.


  • May 12, 2026
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275.


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3480-3486)


  • May 14, 2026
    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.


  • May 14, 2026
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8365.


  • May 14, 2026
    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.


  • May 14, 2026
    Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3486)


  • May 14, 2026
    Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary.


  • May 14, 2026
    The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.


  • May 14, 2026
    POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8365, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Boyle (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3507-3509)


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered as unfinished business.


  • May 14, 2026
    On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 172).
    View Vote


  • May 14, 2026
    On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480)
    View Vote


  • May 14, 2026
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.


  • May 18, 2026
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Law

Related Bills

  • HRES 119-1275: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5625) to direct the Attorney General to make publicly available a list of each State and unit of local government that permits cashless bail, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6260) to amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fraud in connection with posting bail; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8365) to provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 96) expressing support for law enforcement officers; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8469) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027, and for other purposes.
Federal district courtsGovernment employee pay, benefits, personnel managementGovernment information and archivesJudicial procedure and administrationLegal fees and court costs

Monitor Accountability Act

USA119th CongressHR-8365| House 
| Updated: 5/18/2026
The Monitor Accountability Act of 2026 directs the Administrator of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to establish comprehensive rules for district courts appointing monitors to oversee state or local government conduct. These conditions, to be implemented within 90 days, aim to enhance transparency and accountability in the monitoring process. Key provisions include strict limitations on monitor fees , requiring adherence to maximum rates and encouraging pro bono or reduced-rate services. Monitors will be restricted to serving only one monitorship at a time , with a maximum term of five years , and cannot be reappointed under the same court order; subsequent monitors for the same order must also be from a different employer. To ensure public oversight, the bill mandates public notice and comment before a monitor's appointment, and requires monitors to submit annual public accountings of services and fees. Furthermore, any monitorship in effect for six years will result in the case being transferred to a different judge , and existing long-term monitorships are subject to these new appointment and transfer rules.

Bill Text Versions

View Text
3 versions available

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 20, 2026
Introduced in House
Apr 20, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Apr 22, 2026
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Apr 22, 2026
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 11.
May 4, 2026
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 551.
May 4, 2026
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635.
May 12, 2026
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
May 14, 2026
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275.
May 14, 2026
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3480-3486)
May 14, 2026
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
May 14, 2026
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8365.
May 14, 2026
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
May 14, 2026
Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3486)
May 14, 2026
Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary.
May 14, 2026
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
May 14, 2026
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8365, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Boyle (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
May 14, 2026
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3507-3509)
May 14, 2026
Considered as unfinished business.
May 14, 2026
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 172).
View Vote
May 14, 2026
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480)
View Vote
May 14, 2026
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
May 18, 2026
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  • April 20, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • April 20, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • April 22, 2026
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • April 22, 2026
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 11.


  • May 4, 2026
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 551.


  • May 4, 2026
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635.


  • May 12, 2026
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275.


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3480-3486)


  • May 14, 2026
    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.


  • May 14, 2026
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8365.


  • May 14, 2026
    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.


  • May 14, 2026
    Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3486)


  • May 14, 2026
    Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary.


  • May 14, 2026
    The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.


  • May 14, 2026
    POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8365, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Boyle (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3507-3509)


  • May 14, 2026
    Considered as unfinished business.


  • May 14, 2026
    On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 172).
    View Vote


  • May 14, 2026
    On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480)
    View Vote


  • May 14, 2026
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.


  • May 18, 2026
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Andy Biggs

Andy Biggs

Republican Representative

Arizona

Cosponsors (2)
Troy E. Nehls (Republican)Russell Fry (Republican)

Judiciary Committee, Judiciary Committee

Law

Related Bills

  • HRES 119-1275: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5625) to direct the Attorney General to make publicly available a list of each State and unit of local government that permits cashless bail, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6260) to amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fraud in connection with posting bail; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8365) to provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 96) expressing support for law enforcement officers; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8469) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027, and for other purposes.
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Federal district courtsGovernment employee pay, benefits, personnel managementGovernment information and archivesJudicial procedure and administrationLegal fees and court costs