Legis Daily

Protecting Americans’ Retirement Savings From Politics Act

USA119th CongressHR-8286| House 
| Updated: 4/21/2026
Bryan Steil

Bryan Steil

Republican Representative

Wisconsin

Cosponsors (2)
Daniel Meuser (Republican)Ann Wagner (Republican)

Financial Services Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This legislation, known as the "Protecting Americans' Retirement Savings From Politics Act," aims to amend Federal securities laws by introducing a mandatory materiality requirement for disclosure obligations. It stipulates that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), during rulemaking, must ensure issuers are only required to disclose information they determine is material to a voting or investment decision, defining materiality as information a reasonable investor would consider significantly altering the total mix of available information. The bill establishes a Public Company Advisory Committee within the SEC, comprising 10 to 20 members from public companies and related professionals. This committee will advise the SEC on rules, regulations, and policies concerning investor protection, market efficiency, and capital formation, specifically excluding enforcement matters. The SEC is required to review and publicly respond to the committee's findings and recommendations. Furthermore, the bill mandates several studies, including one by the SEC to examine the detrimental impact of European Union Corporate Sustainability Directives on U.S. companies, consumers, and the economy. Another study, to be conducted every five years, will comprehensively assess proxy advisory firms and the proxy process, analyzing financial incentives, potential outsized influence, costs of politically-motivated shareholder proposals, and the economic analysis performed by these firms. A significant portion of the bill focuses on the registration and regulation of proxy advisory firms , making it unlawful for them to provide advice without SEC registration. These firms must certify their ability to provide accurate, economically beneficial advice, disclose conflicts of interest, and establish procedures allowing issuers to review and correct data before recommendations are published. The bill also creates liability for proxy advisory firms that endorse proposals found to violate State or Federal law. The legislation imposes new duties on investment advisers, asset managers, and pension funds regarding their engagement with proxy advisory firms. Institutional investment managers must file annual reports detailing their proxy voting decisions, the extent of reliance on proxy advisory firm recommendations, and how votes align with shareholders' best economic interests. For larger managers, an economic analysis is required for certain votes, and the bill prohibits "robovoting" and outsourcing voting decisions to unregistered entities, while clarifying that no person is required to cast votes unless obligated by fiduciary duty. For passively managed funds , the bill introduces new proxy voting requirements, allowing investment advisers to vote according to beneficial owner instructions, issuer board recommendations, abstention, or mirror voting. This provision includes a safe harbor for advisers following these methods and requires them to disseminate information to beneficial owners regarding voting policy selections. The goal is to empower shareholders in these funds with more control over proxy decisions. Finally, the bill amends the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to define "best interest" for personalized investment advice as being based on pecuniary factors , which are expected to have a material effect on investment risk or return. Non-pecuniary factors may only be considered with informed customer consent or if consistent with the customer's written investment profile, with qualitative disclosure of potential pecuniary effects if non-pecuniary factors are prioritized.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-4767
Protecting Americans’ Retirement Savings from Politics Act
Apr 15, 2026
Introduced in House
Apr 15, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Apr 21, 2026
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 24.
Apr 21, 2026
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-4767
    Protecting Americans’ Retirement Savings from Politics Act


  • April 15, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • April 15, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


  • April 21, 2026
    Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 24.


  • April 21, 2026
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Finance and Financial Sector

Related Bills

  • HR 119-8265: Empowering Shareholders Act of 2026

Protecting Americans’ Retirement Savings From Politics Act

USA119th CongressHR-8286| House 
| Updated: 4/21/2026
This legislation, known as the "Protecting Americans' Retirement Savings From Politics Act," aims to amend Federal securities laws by introducing a mandatory materiality requirement for disclosure obligations. It stipulates that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), during rulemaking, must ensure issuers are only required to disclose information they determine is material to a voting or investment decision, defining materiality as information a reasonable investor would consider significantly altering the total mix of available information. The bill establishes a Public Company Advisory Committee within the SEC, comprising 10 to 20 members from public companies and related professionals. This committee will advise the SEC on rules, regulations, and policies concerning investor protection, market efficiency, and capital formation, specifically excluding enforcement matters. The SEC is required to review and publicly respond to the committee's findings and recommendations. Furthermore, the bill mandates several studies, including one by the SEC to examine the detrimental impact of European Union Corporate Sustainability Directives on U.S. companies, consumers, and the economy. Another study, to be conducted every five years, will comprehensively assess proxy advisory firms and the proxy process, analyzing financial incentives, potential outsized influence, costs of politically-motivated shareholder proposals, and the economic analysis performed by these firms. A significant portion of the bill focuses on the registration and regulation of proxy advisory firms , making it unlawful for them to provide advice without SEC registration. These firms must certify their ability to provide accurate, economically beneficial advice, disclose conflicts of interest, and establish procedures allowing issuers to review and correct data before recommendations are published. The bill also creates liability for proxy advisory firms that endorse proposals found to violate State or Federal law. The legislation imposes new duties on investment advisers, asset managers, and pension funds regarding their engagement with proxy advisory firms. Institutional investment managers must file annual reports detailing their proxy voting decisions, the extent of reliance on proxy advisory firm recommendations, and how votes align with shareholders' best economic interests. For larger managers, an economic analysis is required for certain votes, and the bill prohibits "robovoting" and outsourcing voting decisions to unregistered entities, while clarifying that no person is required to cast votes unless obligated by fiduciary duty. For passively managed funds , the bill introduces new proxy voting requirements, allowing investment advisers to vote according to beneficial owner instructions, issuer board recommendations, abstention, or mirror voting. This provision includes a safe harbor for advisers following these methods and requires them to disseminate information to beneficial owners regarding voting policy selections. The goal is to empower shareholders in these funds with more control over proxy decisions. Finally, the bill amends the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to define "best interest" for personalized investment advice as being based on pecuniary factors , which are expected to have a material effect on investment risk or return. Non-pecuniary factors may only be considered with informed customer consent or if consistent with the customer's written investment profile, with qualitative disclosure of potential pecuniary effects if non-pecuniary factors are prioritized.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-4767
Protecting Americans’ Retirement Savings from Politics Act
Apr 15, 2026
Introduced in House
Apr 15, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Apr 21, 2026
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 24.
Apr 21, 2026
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-4767
    Protecting Americans’ Retirement Savings from Politics Act


  • April 15, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • April 15, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


  • April 21, 2026
    Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 24.


  • April 21, 2026
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Bryan Steil

Bryan Steil

Republican Representative

Wisconsin

Cosponsors (2)
Daniel Meuser (Republican)Ann Wagner (Republican)

Financial Services Committee

Finance and Financial Sector

Related Bills

  • HR 119-8265: Empowering Shareholders Act of 2026
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted