Legis Daily

FREEDOM Act

USA119th CongressHR-7329| House 
| Updated: 2/3/2026
Josh Harder

Josh Harder

Democratic Representative

California

Cosponsors (5)
Kristen McDonald Rivet (Democratic)Don Bacon (Republican)Adam Gray (Democratic)Chuck Edwards (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)
Committees (6)
• Transportation and Infrastructure Committee• Agriculture Committee• Judiciary Committee• Science, Space, and Technology Committee• Energy and Commerce Committee• Natural Resources Committee
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
The "FREEDOM Act" seeks to significantly streamline federal permitting and leasing processes for energy and mineral projects, addressing concerns about regulatory uncertainty, delays, and financial losses that deter critical infrastructure investment. Congress finds that agency failures to meet deadlines or permit revocations cause catastrophic financial losses for project sponsors, undermining energy security and increasing costs for consumers. The bill introduces a new framework for **covered energy projects**, encompassing infrastructure for energy development, carbon capture, and mineral extraction. Project sponsors must submit a notice of initiation, after which a lead agency establishes a project schedule, identifying all required authorizations as either **routine** or **complex**. Agencies are then subject to strict **authorization deadlines**: 90 days for routine authorizations and one year for complex ones, with a two-year deadline for projects requiring an environmental impact statement. Failure by an agency to meet these deadlines or milestones is considered a final agency action, subject to judicial review, unless agreed upon by the project sponsor or due to natural disaster or national emergency. A central provision is the establishment of a **De-Risking Compensation Program** within the Department of Energy. This program aims to reduce regulatory risks and facilitate financing by compensating project sponsors for unrecoverable losses. Compensation is triggered if the U.S. Court of Federal Claims determines losses resulted from events like authorization revocation, agency failure to issue a decision by deadline, or unreasonable delay. Project sponsors enroll by paying an annual premium, and claims require demonstrating capital contribution and the causal link between agency action/inaction and unrecoverable loss. The bill also establishes **expedited judicial review** for project sponsors to challenge final agency actions, alleged failures to act, or orders halting projects. Reviewing courts are mandated to establish expedited schedules and aim to issue decisions within 120 days. Remedies include setting aside unlawful actions, remanding matters to agencies with strict deadlines, compelling agency action, and awarding attorneys' fees and costs to prevailing project sponsors. Agencies failing to comply with court orders face civil penalties, ranging from $1,000 to $100,000 per day, payable into a new Permitting Performance Fund. If an agency fails to meet deadlines, courts may authorize project sponsors to retain **court-approved contractors** to complete necessary analyses, with costs paid from the Permitting Performance Fund. These contractors must adhere to professional standards, and their work product is deemed received by the agency, which must issue a decision within 30 days or identify specific legal deficiencies. Furthermore, the bill limits federal actions against **fully permitted projects**, defined as those having received a substantial majority of required authorizations. Agencies are prohibited from issuing orders to halt, suspend, or revoke permits for such projects unless there is a clear, immediate, and substantiated harm, or the authorization is illegal and no other remedy exists. Agencies also cannot petition a court for voluntary remand of an authorization for a fully permitted project without the project sponsor's consent. Specific reforms are included for geothermal energy, such as requiring annual lease sales, establishing cost recovery mechanisms, and creating a Geothermal Ombudsman within the Bureau of Land Management. It also streamlines permitting for oil and gas and geothermal activities on non-Federal land where the Federal Government owns less than 50 percent of the mineral estate, by not requiring a separate Federal drilling permit if State permits are obtained. Finally, the bill mandates the Government Accountability Office to conduct annual surveys on industry satisfaction with federal permitting and report on agency adherence to deadlines and potential unfair treatment of energy sources.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-6947
FREEDOM Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-5592
FREEDOM Act
Feb 3, 2026
Introduced in House
Feb 3, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, Science, Space, and Technology, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 10, 2026

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-3360
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-6947
    FREEDOM Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-5592
    FREEDOM Act


  • February 3, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • February 3, 2026
    Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, Science, Space, and Technology, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


  • February 10, 2026

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-3360
    Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

Energy

FREEDOM Act

USA119th CongressHR-7329| House 
| Updated: 2/3/2026
The "FREEDOM Act" seeks to significantly streamline federal permitting and leasing processes for energy and mineral projects, addressing concerns about regulatory uncertainty, delays, and financial losses that deter critical infrastructure investment. Congress finds that agency failures to meet deadlines or permit revocations cause catastrophic financial losses for project sponsors, undermining energy security and increasing costs for consumers. The bill introduces a new framework for **covered energy projects**, encompassing infrastructure for energy development, carbon capture, and mineral extraction. Project sponsors must submit a notice of initiation, after which a lead agency establishes a project schedule, identifying all required authorizations as either **routine** or **complex**. Agencies are then subject to strict **authorization deadlines**: 90 days for routine authorizations and one year for complex ones, with a two-year deadline for projects requiring an environmental impact statement. Failure by an agency to meet these deadlines or milestones is considered a final agency action, subject to judicial review, unless agreed upon by the project sponsor or due to natural disaster or national emergency. A central provision is the establishment of a **De-Risking Compensation Program** within the Department of Energy. This program aims to reduce regulatory risks and facilitate financing by compensating project sponsors for unrecoverable losses. Compensation is triggered if the U.S. Court of Federal Claims determines losses resulted from events like authorization revocation, agency failure to issue a decision by deadline, or unreasonable delay. Project sponsors enroll by paying an annual premium, and claims require demonstrating capital contribution and the causal link between agency action/inaction and unrecoverable loss. The bill also establishes **expedited judicial review** for project sponsors to challenge final agency actions, alleged failures to act, or orders halting projects. Reviewing courts are mandated to establish expedited schedules and aim to issue decisions within 120 days. Remedies include setting aside unlawful actions, remanding matters to agencies with strict deadlines, compelling agency action, and awarding attorneys' fees and costs to prevailing project sponsors. Agencies failing to comply with court orders face civil penalties, ranging from $1,000 to $100,000 per day, payable into a new Permitting Performance Fund. If an agency fails to meet deadlines, courts may authorize project sponsors to retain **court-approved contractors** to complete necessary analyses, with costs paid from the Permitting Performance Fund. These contractors must adhere to professional standards, and their work product is deemed received by the agency, which must issue a decision within 30 days or identify specific legal deficiencies. Furthermore, the bill limits federal actions against **fully permitted projects**, defined as those having received a substantial majority of required authorizations. Agencies are prohibited from issuing orders to halt, suspend, or revoke permits for such projects unless there is a clear, immediate, and substantiated harm, or the authorization is illegal and no other remedy exists. Agencies also cannot petition a court for voluntary remand of an authorization for a fully permitted project without the project sponsor's consent. Specific reforms are included for geothermal energy, such as requiring annual lease sales, establishing cost recovery mechanisms, and creating a Geothermal Ombudsman within the Bureau of Land Management. It also streamlines permitting for oil and gas and geothermal activities on non-Federal land where the Federal Government owns less than 50 percent of the mineral estate, by not requiring a separate Federal drilling permit if State permits are obtained. Finally, the bill mandates the Government Accountability Office to conduct annual surveys on industry satisfaction with federal permitting and report on agency adherence to deadlines and potential unfair treatment of energy sources.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-6947
FREEDOM Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-5592
FREEDOM Act
Feb 3, 2026
Introduced in House
Feb 3, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, Science, Space, and Technology, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Feb 10, 2026

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-3360
Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-6947
    FREEDOM Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-5592
    FREEDOM Act


  • February 3, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • February 3, 2026
    Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, Science, Space, and Technology, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


  • February 10, 2026

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-3360
    Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Josh Harder

Josh Harder

Democratic Representative

California

Cosponsors (5)
Kristen McDonald Rivet (Democratic)Don Bacon (Republican)Adam Gray (Democratic)Chuck Edwards (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)
Committees (6)
• Transportation and Infrastructure Committee• Agriculture Committee• Judiciary Committee• Science, Space, and Technology Committee• Energy and Commerce Committee• Natural Resources Committee

Energy

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted