Legis Daily

SHIELD Act

USA119th CongressHR-7066| House 
| Updated: 1/14/2026
Mike Levin

Mike Levin

Democratic Representative

California

Cosponsors (11)
Greg Landsman (Democratic)Ted Lieu (Democratic)George Latimer (Democratic)Daniel S. Goldman (Democratic)Kathy Castor (Democratic)Salud O. Carbajal (Democratic)Mike Quigley (Democratic)Sean Casten (Democratic)Seth Magaziner (Democratic)Kevin Mullin (Democratic)Chellie Pingree (Democratic)

Energy and Commerce Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to introduce new standards specifically addressing large load facilities , defining them as a distinct class of electric consumers. These facilities are characterized by a peak demand exceeding 75 megawatts, with exceptions for existing facilities increasing demand primarily for electrification or greenhouse gas reduction. The legislation aims to ensure equitable cost allocation and promote grid reliability in response to the growing energy demands of such large consumers. A central provision mandates that electric utilities must fully recover all costs from large load facilities for any necessary upgrades to generation, transmission, or distribution infrastructure required to meet their electricity demand. This cost recovery obligation is designed to prevent financial burdens from shifting to other consumers, ensuring the specific class of large load facilities bears the full expense, even if a facility ceases operations or uses less electricity than initially projected. Furthermore, the bill directs electric utilities to prioritize service requests from large load facilities that agree to implement specific measures to benefit the grid, such as employing features to reduce demand during peak times or committing to using zero-emission electric energy generated onsite or procured through power purchase agreements. State regulatory authorities and nonregulated utilities are required to commence consideration of these new standards within one year and complete their determinations within two years. They must then report their findings and processes to Congress, detailing their rationale for the determinations made. However, exemptions apply for states that have already implemented comparable standards or conducted relevant proceedings within a specified timeframe, streamlining the process for those already addressing similar issues.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-7005
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-2896
SHIELD Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-489
SHIELD Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-9415
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-6998
SHIELD Act of 2022

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-4416
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-8838
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-3801
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-2671
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-9488
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-10329
SHIELD Act of 2024

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-8980
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-8746
SHIELD Act of 2024

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-8463
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-7959
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-5703
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-3686
SHIELD Act of 2023

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-62
SHIELD Act
Feb 11, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-516
Introduced in Senate
Jan 14, 2026
Introduced in House
Jan 14, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-7005
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-2896
    SHIELD Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-489
    SHIELD Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-9415
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-6998
    SHIELD Act of 2022


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-4416
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-8838
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-3801
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-2671
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-9488
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-10329
    SHIELD Act of 2024


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-8980
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-8746
    SHIELD Act of 2024


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-8463
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-7959
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-5703
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-3686
    SHIELD Act of 2023


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-62
    SHIELD Act


  • February 11, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-516
    Introduced in Senate


  • January 14, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • January 14, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Energy

SHIELD Act

USA119th CongressHR-7066| House 
| Updated: 1/14/2026
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to introduce new standards specifically addressing large load facilities , defining them as a distinct class of electric consumers. These facilities are characterized by a peak demand exceeding 75 megawatts, with exceptions for existing facilities increasing demand primarily for electrification or greenhouse gas reduction. The legislation aims to ensure equitable cost allocation and promote grid reliability in response to the growing energy demands of such large consumers. A central provision mandates that electric utilities must fully recover all costs from large load facilities for any necessary upgrades to generation, transmission, or distribution infrastructure required to meet their electricity demand. This cost recovery obligation is designed to prevent financial burdens from shifting to other consumers, ensuring the specific class of large load facilities bears the full expense, even if a facility ceases operations or uses less electricity than initially projected. Furthermore, the bill directs electric utilities to prioritize service requests from large load facilities that agree to implement specific measures to benefit the grid, such as employing features to reduce demand during peak times or committing to using zero-emission electric energy generated onsite or procured through power purchase agreements. State regulatory authorities and nonregulated utilities are required to commence consideration of these new standards within one year and complete their determinations within two years. They must then report their findings and processes to Congress, detailing their rationale for the determinations made. However, exemptions apply for states that have already implemented comparable standards or conducted relevant proceedings within a specified timeframe, streamlining the process for those already addressing similar issues.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-7005
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-2896
SHIELD Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-489
SHIELD Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-9415
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-6998
SHIELD Act of 2022

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-4416
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-8838
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-3801
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-2671
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-9488
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-10329
SHIELD Act of 2024

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-8980
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-8746
SHIELD Act of 2024

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-8463
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-7959
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-5703
SHIELD Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-3686
SHIELD Act of 2023

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-62
SHIELD Act
Feb 11, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-516
Introduced in Senate
Jan 14, 2026
Introduced in House
Jan 14, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-7005
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-2896
    SHIELD Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-489
    SHIELD Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-9415
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-6998
    SHIELD Act of 2022


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-4416
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-8838
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-3801
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-2671
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-9488
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-10329
    SHIELD Act of 2024


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-8980
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-8746
    SHIELD Act of 2024


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-8463
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-7959
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-5703
    SHIELD Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-3686
    SHIELD Act of 2023


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-62
    SHIELD Act


  • February 11, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-516
    Introduced in Senate


  • January 14, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • January 14, 2026
    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Mike Levin

Mike Levin

Democratic Representative

California

Cosponsors (11)
Greg Landsman (Democratic)Ted Lieu (Democratic)George Latimer (Democratic)Daniel S. Goldman (Democratic)Kathy Castor (Democratic)Salud O. Carbajal (Democratic)Mike Quigley (Democratic)Sean Casten (Democratic)Seth Magaziner (Democratic)Kevin Mullin (Democratic)Chellie Pingree (Democratic)

Energy and Commerce Committee

Energy

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted