Legis Daily

Mental Health TALK SAFE Act of 2026

USA119th CongressHR-6994| House 
| Updated: 1/9/2026
Neal P. Dunn

Neal P. Dunn

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (1)
Don Bacon (Republican)

Judiciary Committee, Energy and Commerce Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This legislation, known as the Mental Health TALK SAFE Act of 2026, aims to significantly expand the use of telehealth for prescribing controlled substances, particularly for mental health disorders and opioid use disorder. It amends the Controlled Substances Act to allow telehealth practitioners to issue valid prescriptions for approved mental health controlled substances and for opioid use disorder treatment after at least one telehealth evaluation . This change is intended to improve access to care for patients needing these specific treatments. The bill introduces comprehensive definitions for telehealth entity and telehealth practitioner , outlining stringent operational and employment requirements for these organizations. These include restrictions on ownership interests with mail-order pharmacies, specific patient payment models, and minimum percentages for mental health services and full-time employees. Telehealth entities must also employ dedicated compliance, clinical quality, and medical officers, with the latter two roles requiring board-certified psychiatrists. To ensure patient access, the bill prohibits pharmacists from refusing to fill a prescription solely because it was issued via a telehealth evaluation, requiring them to attempt validation by contacting the patient and prescriber first. Violations of this provision can incur a civil penalty. Furthermore, the Act simplifies interstate practice by exempting practitioners from needing additional DEA registrations in other states when dispensing controlled substances via telemedicine or telehealth evaluation. The legislation also facilitates interstate practice for psychiatrists, allowing a covered psychiatrist licensed in a primary State to provide services in a secondary State if the licensure requirements are substantially similar and the services are within their scope of practice. This provision requires medical professional liability insurance to cover services provided in the secondary State. Finally, the Act includes a preemption clause, ensuring that its provisions supersede any state laws or regulations that would otherwise restrict or prohibit the activities it permits.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Jan 9, 2026
Introduced in House
Jan 9, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • January 9, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • January 9, 2026
    Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Health

Mental Health TALK SAFE Act of 2026

USA119th CongressHR-6994| House 
| Updated: 1/9/2026
This legislation, known as the Mental Health TALK SAFE Act of 2026, aims to significantly expand the use of telehealth for prescribing controlled substances, particularly for mental health disorders and opioid use disorder. It amends the Controlled Substances Act to allow telehealth practitioners to issue valid prescriptions for approved mental health controlled substances and for opioid use disorder treatment after at least one telehealth evaluation . This change is intended to improve access to care for patients needing these specific treatments. The bill introduces comprehensive definitions for telehealth entity and telehealth practitioner , outlining stringent operational and employment requirements for these organizations. These include restrictions on ownership interests with mail-order pharmacies, specific patient payment models, and minimum percentages for mental health services and full-time employees. Telehealth entities must also employ dedicated compliance, clinical quality, and medical officers, with the latter two roles requiring board-certified psychiatrists. To ensure patient access, the bill prohibits pharmacists from refusing to fill a prescription solely because it was issued via a telehealth evaluation, requiring them to attempt validation by contacting the patient and prescriber first. Violations of this provision can incur a civil penalty. Furthermore, the Act simplifies interstate practice by exempting practitioners from needing additional DEA registrations in other states when dispensing controlled substances via telemedicine or telehealth evaluation. The legislation also facilitates interstate practice for psychiatrists, allowing a covered psychiatrist licensed in a primary State to provide services in a secondary State if the licensure requirements are substantially similar and the services are within their scope of practice. This provision requires medical professional liability insurance to cover services provided in the secondary State. Finally, the Act includes a preemption clause, ensuring that its provisions supersede any state laws or regulations that would otherwise restrict or prohibit the activities it permits.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Jan 9, 2026
Introduced in House
Jan 9, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • January 9, 2026
    Introduced in House


  • January 9, 2026
    Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Neal P. Dunn

Neal P. Dunn

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (1)
Don Bacon (Republican)

Judiciary Committee, Energy and Commerce Committee

Health

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted