Legis Daily

AI OVERWATCH Act

USA119th CongressHR-6875| House 
| Updated: 12/18/2025
Brian J. Mast

Brian J. Mast

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (27)
Sheri Biggs (Republican)Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (Republican)Warren Davidson (Republican)David J. Taylor (Republican)Darin LaHood (Republican)Zachary Nunn (Republican)Keith Self (Republican)Young Kim (Republican)Nathaniel Moran (Republican)Maria Elvira Salazar (Republican)Dan Newhouse (Republican)Thomas H. Kean (Republican)James R. Baird (Republican)Gregory W. Meeks (Democratic)John R. Moolenaar (Republican)Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Democratic)Brad Sherman (Democratic)Mike Haridopolos (Republican)Pat Harrigan (Republican)Michael T. McCaul (Republican)Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen (Republican)Randy Fine (Republican)James C. Moylan (Republican)Brian K. Fitzpatrick (Republican)Bill Huizenga (Republican)Max L. Miller (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)

Foreign Affairs Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This bill, titled the AI OVERWATCH Act, establishes stringent controls on the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of certain advanced integrated circuits to designated countries of concern . These countries include the People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. The legislation specifically targets high-performance integrated circuits, computers, and related products, including those critical for artificial intelligence applications, by defining them as 'covered integrated circuits.' Upon enactment, all existing licenses for such transfers to these countries are immediately terminated . The Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security is now required to mandate a license for any transfer of covered integrated circuits to entities in or ultimately controlled by a country of concern, explicitly prohibiting general licenses. Before approving any license, the Under Secretary must provide Congress with detailed certifications, including assurances that the transfer will not support the military, intelligence, surveillance, or cyber capabilities of the recipient country. These certifications must also confirm no adverse impact on the availability of circuits for U.S. persons or on the U.S. advantage in processing power. Congress then has a 30-day period to review and potentially block the proposed transfer through a joint resolution, and all licenses are temporarily denied until a national security strategy is submitted. An exemption from certain license requirements is created for trusted United States persons , provided the covered integrated circuits are destined for non-concern countries and remain under their ownership and control. The Under Secretary must establish regulations for this designation, including strict security standards, limits on the transfer of processing performance outside the U.S., and restrictions on foreign ownership from countries of concern. The bill also directs the Under Secretary to explore expanding this exemption program to U.S. allies. Furthermore, it mandates the Secretary of Commerce and other key agencies to develop a national security strategy assessing the implications of access to these technologies by countries of concern and their indigenous production capabilities.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Dec 18, 2025
Introduced in House
Dec 18, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  • December 18, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • December 18, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

International Affairs

AI OVERWATCH Act

USA119th CongressHR-6875| House 
| Updated: 12/18/2025
This bill, titled the AI OVERWATCH Act, establishes stringent controls on the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of certain advanced integrated circuits to designated countries of concern . These countries include the People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. The legislation specifically targets high-performance integrated circuits, computers, and related products, including those critical for artificial intelligence applications, by defining them as 'covered integrated circuits.' Upon enactment, all existing licenses for such transfers to these countries are immediately terminated . The Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security is now required to mandate a license for any transfer of covered integrated circuits to entities in or ultimately controlled by a country of concern, explicitly prohibiting general licenses. Before approving any license, the Under Secretary must provide Congress with detailed certifications, including assurances that the transfer will not support the military, intelligence, surveillance, or cyber capabilities of the recipient country. These certifications must also confirm no adverse impact on the availability of circuits for U.S. persons or on the U.S. advantage in processing power. Congress then has a 30-day period to review and potentially block the proposed transfer through a joint resolution, and all licenses are temporarily denied until a national security strategy is submitted. An exemption from certain license requirements is created for trusted United States persons , provided the covered integrated circuits are destined for non-concern countries and remain under their ownership and control. The Under Secretary must establish regulations for this designation, including strict security standards, limits on the transfer of processing performance outside the U.S., and restrictions on foreign ownership from countries of concern. The bill also directs the Under Secretary to explore expanding this exemption program to U.S. allies. Furthermore, it mandates the Secretary of Commerce and other key agencies to develop a national security strategy assessing the implications of access to these technologies by countries of concern and their indigenous production capabilities.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Dec 18, 2025
Introduced in House
Dec 18, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  • December 18, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • December 18, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Brian J. Mast

Brian J. Mast

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (27)
Sheri Biggs (Republican)Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (Republican)Warren Davidson (Republican)David J. Taylor (Republican)Darin LaHood (Republican)Zachary Nunn (Republican)Keith Self (Republican)Young Kim (Republican)Nathaniel Moran (Republican)Maria Elvira Salazar (Republican)Dan Newhouse (Republican)Thomas H. Kean (Republican)James R. Baird (Republican)Gregory W. Meeks (Democratic)John R. Moolenaar (Republican)Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Democratic)Brad Sherman (Democratic)Mike Haridopolos (Republican)Pat Harrigan (Republican)Michael T. McCaul (Republican)Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen (Republican)Randy Fine (Republican)James C. Moylan (Republican)Brian K. Fitzpatrick (Republican)Bill Huizenga (Republican)Max L. Miller (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)

Foreign Affairs Committee

International Affairs

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted