Legis Daily

MERIT Act of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-687| House 
| Updated: 1/23/2025
Barry Loudermilk

Barry Loudermilk

Republican Representative

Georgia

Cosponsors (24)
Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (Republican)Tim Burchett (Republican)Andy Harris (Republican)Scott Franklin (Republican)Elijah Crane (Republican)Mike Collins (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Earl L. "Buddy" Carter (Republican)J. French Hill (Republican)Anna Paulina Luna (Republican)Daniel Meuser (Republican)James R. Baird (Republican)W. Gregory Steube (Republican)Daniel Webster (Republican)Mary E. Miller (Republican)John W. Rose (Republican)Burgess Owens (Republican)Randy K. Sr. Weber (Republican)Monica De La Cruz (Republican)Mark Harris (Republican)Erin Houchin (Republican)Josh Brecheen (Republican)Tracey Mann (Republican)Brian Babin (Republican)

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
The Modern Employment Reform, Improvement, and Transformation Act of 2025, or MERIT Act of 2025, aims to streamline and expedite processes for addressing federal employee performance and misconduct. It repeals the current Chapter 43 authority for performance-based actions, integrating them into the broader adverse action framework under Chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code. This shift is intended to create a more unified and efficient system for managing employee issues. A key provision of the bill amends Section 7513 to cover both performance and misconduct, requiring agencies to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence . It establishes specific factors for agencies to consider when making initial decisions and mandates that agencies uphold decisions supported by substantial evidence . The bill also introduces expedited timelines, requiring notice, response, and a final decision within an aggregate of 15 business days, and explicitly states that agencies are not required to place an employee on a performance improvement plan (PIP) before taking action. For employees subject to a reduction in grade, the bill stipulates that they will immediately receive the lower rate of pay and cannot be placed on administrative leave with pay during an appeal. Similar expedited procedures and standards are applied to Senior Executive Service (SES) members and supervisors , with new provisions for SES pay retention and a dedicated section for supervisor actions. Disciplinary actions against supervisors for whistleblower retaliation are also accelerated. The MERIT Act extends probationary periods to two years for both competitive service employees and SES members, a significant increase from the current one-year period. Agencies are required to clearly communicate the terms and conditions of these probationary periods, including any formal training or license requirements. This aims to ensure new employees are thoroughly evaluated before gaining full career status. To enhance accountability, the bill prohibits employees from grieving adverse actions or reductions in force (RIFs) through collective bargaining agreements, directing these matters to statutory appeal processes like the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). This provision seeks to prevent delays and ensure consistent application of personnel rules across the federal government. The legislation also introduces new financial accountability measures. Agencies are prohibited from awarding bonuses for five years to employees who have an "adverse finding" against them, defined as a serious policy or legal violation. Furthermore, if an adverse finding occurs after a bonus is awarded, the agency must order the employee to repay the bonus amount, with employees required to sign a certification agreeing to this condition. Another significant change involves the reduction of annuities for employees convicted of felonies related to their official duties. If a federal employee is convicted of a felony based on acts or omissions in their official capacity that would warrant removal, the period of "felonious service" will not count towards their annuity calculation. This provision includes procedures for notice, response, and appeal to the MSPB, with an exception for spouses who cooperate with authorities. Finally, the bill modifies furlough procedures, introducing the concept of an "emergency furlough" due to a lapse in appropriations, which would involve minimal procedural rights. For general furloughs, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is tasked with promulgating new regulations outlining specific procedures and appeal rights. The Act generally takes effect one year after enactment, and its established procedures will supersede any inconsistent collective bargaining agreements.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-3348
MERIT Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-9409
MERIT Act of 2022

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-3499
MERIT Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-133
MERIT Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-10397
MERIT Act of 2024
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced in House
Jan 23, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Feb 20, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-662
Introduced in Senate
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-3348
    MERIT Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-9409
    MERIT Act of 2022


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-3499
    MERIT Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-133
    MERIT Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-10397
    MERIT Act of 2024


  • January 23, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • January 23, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.


  • February 20, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-662
    Introduced in Senate

Government Operations and Politics

Administrative law and regulatory proceduresAdministrative remediesCriminal justice information and recordsEmployee benefits and pensionsEmployee performanceEmployment discrimination and employee rightsFamily relationshipsGovernment employee pay, benefits, personnel managementGovernment ethics and transparency, public corruptionIncome tax deferralMerit Systems Protection BoardOffice of Personnel Management (OPM)Personnel recordsUnemploymentWages and earnings

MERIT Act of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-687| House 
| Updated: 1/23/2025
The Modern Employment Reform, Improvement, and Transformation Act of 2025, or MERIT Act of 2025, aims to streamline and expedite processes for addressing federal employee performance and misconduct. It repeals the current Chapter 43 authority for performance-based actions, integrating them into the broader adverse action framework under Chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code. This shift is intended to create a more unified and efficient system for managing employee issues. A key provision of the bill amends Section 7513 to cover both performance and misconduct, requiring agencies to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence . It establishes specific factors for agencies to consider when making initial decisions and mandates that agencies uphold decisions supported by substantial evidence . The bill also introduces expedited timelines, requiring notice, response, and a final decision within an aggregate of 15 business days, and explicitly states that agencies are not required to place an employee on a performance improvement plan (PIP) before taking action. For employees subject to a reduction in grade, the bill stipulates that they will immediately receive the lower rate of pay and cannot be placed on administrative leave with pay during an appeal. Similar expedited procedures and standards are applied to Senior Executive Service (SES) members and supervisors , with new provisions for SES pay retention and a dedicated section for supervisor actions. Disciplinary actions against supervisors for whistleblower retaliation are also accelerated. The MERIT Act extends probationary periods to two years for both competitive service employees and SES members, a significant increase from the current one-year period. Agencies are required to clearly communicate the terms and conditions of these probationary periods, including any formal training or license requirements. This aims to ensure new employees are thoroughly evaluated before gaining full career status. To enhance accountability, the bill prohibits employees from grieving adverse actions or reductions in force (RIFs) through collective bargaining agreements, directing these matters to statutory appeal processes like the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). This provision seeks to prevent delays and ensure consistent application of personnel rules across the federal government. The legislation also introduces new financial accountability measures. Agencies are prohibited from awarding bonuses for five years to employees who have an "adverse finding" against them, defined as a serious policy or legal violation. Furthermore, if an adverse finding occurs after a bonus is awarded, the agency must order the employee to repay the bonus amount, with employees required to sign a certification agreeing to this condition. Another significant change involves the reduction of annuities for employees convicted of felonies related to their official duties. If a federal employee is convicted of a felony based on acts or omissions in their official capacity that would warrant removal, the period of "felonious service" will not count towards their annuity calculation. This provision includes procedures for notice, response, and appeal to the MSPB, with an exception for spouses who cooperate with authorities. Finally, the bill modifies furlough procedures, introducing the concept of an "emergency furlough" due to a lapse in appropriations, which would involve minimal procedural rights. For general furloughs, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is tasked with promulgating new regulations outlining specific procedures and appeal rights. The Act generally takes effect one year after enactment, and its established procedures will supersede any inconsistent collective bargaining agreements.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-3348
MERIT Act of 2019

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-9409
MERIT Act of 2022

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-3499
MERIT Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-133
MERIT Act

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-10397
MERIT Act of 2024
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced in House
Jan 23, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Feb 20, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-662
Introduced in Senate
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-3348
    MERIT Act of 2019


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-9409
    MERIT Act of 2022


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-3499
    MERIT Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-133
    MERIT Act


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-10397
    MERIT Act of 2024


  • January 23, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • January 23, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.


  • February 20, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-662
    Introduced in Senate
Barry Loudermilk

Barry Loudermilk

Republican Representative

Georgia

Cosponsors (24)
Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (Republican)Tim Burchett (Republican)Andy Harris (Republican)Scott Franklin (Republican)Elijah Crane (Republican)Mike Collins (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Earl L. "Buddy" Carter (Republican)J. French Hill (Republican)Anna Paulina Luna (Republican)Daniel Meuser (Republican)James R. Baird (Republican)W. Gregory Steube (Republican)Daniel Webster (Republican)Mary E. Miller (Republican)John W. Rose (Republican)Burgess Owens (Republican)Randy K. Sr. Weber (Republican)Monica De La Cruz (Republican)Mark Harris (Republican)Erin Houchin (Republican)Josh Brecheen (Republican)Tracey Mann (Republican)Brian Babin (Republican)

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Government Operations and Politics

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Administrative law and regulatory proceduresAdministrative remediesCriminal justice information and recordsEmployee benefits and pensionsEmployee performanceEmployment discrimination and employee rightsFamily relationshipsGovernment employee pay, benefits, personnel managementGovernment ethics and transparency, public corruptionIncome tax deferralMerit Systems Protection BoardOffice of Personnel Management (OPM)Personnel recordsUnemploymentWages and earnings