Legis Daily

Least Cost Exception Act

USA119th CongressHR-6547| House 
| Updated: 2/2/2026
Mike Flood

Mike Flood

Republican Representative

Nebraska

Cosponsors (4)
Bill Foster (Democratic)John W. Rose (Republican)Jared Moskowitz (Democratic)Michael Lawler (Republican)

Financial Services Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
The "Least Cost Exception Act" amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to introduce a significant exception to the existing requirement that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) resolve failing insured depository institutions at the least cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). This bill empowers the FDIC to choose an alternative resolution method that is not the absolute least costly, specifically when such a choice serves to limit the further concentration of the United States banking system among global systemically important banking organizations (GSIBs) . For this exception to apply, the FDIC, in conjunction with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and after consulting the Secretary of the Treasury, must determine that the potential additional risks to the DIF are outweighed by the reasonably expected benefits of reducing banking system concentration. The selected alternative must still be the least costly among options that do not involve a GSIB and do not exceed the cost of liquidation. Furthermore, the difference in cost between the chosen alternative and the least costly option involving a GSIB must remain below a maximum threshold, which the FDIC is mandated to establish by rule within one year of enactment. If the alternative involves another entity purchasing assets or assuming liabilities, that entity must agree to pay an assessment to the DIF over at least five years, covering the additional cost incurred. The FDIC is also required to report to Congress within 30 days of utilizing this exception, detailing the economic difference in cost compared to the least costly alternative that would have been chosen otherwise.

Bill Text Versions

View Text
2 versions available

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Dec 10, 2025
Introduced in House
Dec 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Dec 16, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Dec 17, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 0.
Dec 17, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Feb 2, 2026
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.
Feb 2, 2026
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.
  • December 10, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • December 10, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


  • December 16, 2025
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • December 17, 2025
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 0.


  • December 17, 2025
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • February 2, 2026
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.


  • February 2, 2026
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.

Finance and Financial Sector

Related Bills

  • HR 119-6955: Main Street Capital Access Act
Accounting and auditingBank accounts, deposits, capitalBanking and financial institutions regulationCongressional oversightCorporate finance and managementFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)Performance measurementUser charges and fees

Least Cost Exception Act

USA119th CongressHR-6547| House 
| Updated: 2/2/2026
The "Least Cost Exception Act" amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to introduce a significant exception to the existing requirement that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) resolve failing insured depository institutions at the least cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). This bill empowers the FDIC to choose an alternative resolution method that is not the absolute least costly, specifically when such a choice serves to limit the further concentration of the United States banking system among global systemically important banking organizations (GSIBs) . For this exception to apply, the FDIC, in conjunction with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and after consulting the Secretary of the Treasury, must determine that the potential additional risks to the DIF are outweighed by the reasonably expected benefits of reducing banking system concentration. The selected alternative must still be the least costly among options that do not involve a GSIB and do not exceed the cost of liquidation. Furthermore, the difference in cost between the chosen alternative and the least costly option involving a GSIB must remain below a maximum threshold, which the FDIC is mandated to establish by rule within one year of enactment. If the alternative involves another entity purchasing assets or assuming liabilities, that entity must agree to pay an assessment to the DIF over at least five years, covering the additional cost incurred. The FDIC is also required to report to Congress within 30 days of utilizing this exception, detailing the economic difference in cost compared to the least costly alternative that would have been chosen otherwise.

Bill Text Versions

View Text
2 versions available

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Dec 10, 2025
Introduced in House
Dec 10, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Dec 16, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Dec 17, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 0.
Dec 17, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Feb 2, 2026
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.
Feb 2, 2026
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.
  • December 10, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • December 10, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


  • December 16, 2025
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • December 17, 2025
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 0.


  • December 17, 2025
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • February 2, 2026
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.


  • February 2, 2026
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.
Mike Flood

Mike Flood

Republican Representative

Nebraska

Cosponsors (4)
Bill Foster (Democratic)John W. Rose (Republican)Jared Moskowitz (Democratic)Michael Lawler (Republican)

Financial Services Committee

Finance and Financial Sector

Related Bills

  • HR 119-6955: Main Street Capital Access Act
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Accounting and auditingBank accounts, deposits, capitalBanking and financial institutions regulationCongressional oversightCorporate finance and managementFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)Performance measurementUser charges and fees