Legis Daily

FAST Justice Act

USA119th CongressHR-5724| House 
| Updated: 10/8/2025
James R. Walkinshaw

James R. Walkinshaw

Democratic Representative

Virginia

Cosponsors (19)
Steny H. Hoyer (Democratic)Jennifer L. McClellan (Democratic)Greg Landsman (Democratic)Eugene Simon Vindman (Democratic)Steven Horsford (Democratic)Dina Titus (Democratic)Melanie A. Stansbury (Democratic)Sarah Elfreth (Democratic)Haley M. Stevens (Democratic)Shri Thanedar (Democratic)Henry C. "Hank" Johnson (Democratic)Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (Democratic)Stephen F. Lynch (Democratic)Suhas Subramanyam (Democratic)Eleanor Holmes Norton (Democratic)Timothy M. Kennedy (Democratic)Lois Frankel (Democratic)Josh Gottheimer (Democratic)Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Democratic)

Judiciary Committee, Oversight and Government Reform Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
The Fair Access to Swift and Timely Justice Act, or FAST Justice Act, seeks to accelerate the resolution of appeals filed by federal employees and job applicants with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) . It amends chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to introduce a mechanism for recourse when the MSPB fails to issue a timely ruling. Specifically, if the MSPB has not taken an action subject to judicial review within 120 days of an appeal being filed, excluding certain cases, the affected individual gains the right to pursue a civil action. This civil action can be initiated in a U.S. district court, located either where the personnel action occurred, where the employee would have been employed, or where the respondent's principal office is situated. The court will apply specific standards for judicial review, using the standard from section 7703(c) for MSPB orders and decisions, and the standard the MSPB would have applied for other determinations. Upon the filing of such a civil action, the MSPB is required to stay its administrative appeal process , resuming it only if the civil action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This measure is designed to prevent indefinite delays and ensure federal employees and applicants have a prompt avenue for addressing personnel actions.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Oct 7, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-2977
Introduced in Senate
Oct 8, 2025
Introduced in House
Oct 8, 2025
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • October 7, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-2977
    Introduced in Senate


  • October 8, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • October 8, 2025
    Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Government Operations and Politics

Related Bills

  • S 119-2977: FAST Justice Act

FAST Justice Act

USA119th CongressHR-5724| House 
| Updated: 10/8/2025
The Fair Access to Swift and Timely Justice Act, or FAST Justice Act, seeks to accelerate the resolution of appeals filed by federal employees and job applicants with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) . It amends chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to introduce a mechanism for recourse when the MSPB fails to issue a timely ruling. Specifically, if the MSPB has not taken an action subject to judicial review within 120 days of an appeal being filed, excluding certain cases, the affected individual gains the right to pursue a civil action. This civil action can be initiated in a U.S. district court, located either where the personnel action occurred, where the employee would have been employed, or where the respondent's principal office is situated. The court will apply specific standards for judicial review, using the standard from section 7703(c) for MSPB orders and decisions, and the standard the MSPB would have applied for other determinations. Upon the filing of such a civil action, the MSPB is required to stay its administrative appeal process , resuming it only if the civil action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This measure is designed to prevent indefinite delays and ensure federal employees and applicants have a prompt avenue for addressing personnel actions.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Oct 7, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-2977
Introduced in Senate
Oct 8, 2025
Introduced in House
Oct 8, 2025
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • October 7, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-2977
    Introduced in Senate


  • October 8, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • October 8, 2025
    Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
James R. Walkinshaw

James R. Walkinshaw

Democratic Representative

Virginia

Cosponsors (19)
Steny H. Hoyer (Democratic)Jennifer L. McClellan (Democratic)Greg Landsman (Democratic)Eugene Simon Vindman (Democratic)Steven Horsford (Democratic)Dina Titus (Democratic)Melanie A. Stansbury (Democratic)Sarah Elfreth (Democratic)Haley M. Stevens (Democratic)Shri Thanedar (Democratic)Henry C. "Hank" Johnson (Democratic)Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (Democratic)Stephen F. Lynch (Democratic)Suhas Subramanyam (Democratic)Eleanor Holmes Norton (Democratic)Timothy M. Kennedy (Democratic)Lois Frankel (Democratic)Josh Gottheimer (Democratic)Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Democratic)

Judiciary Committee, Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Government Operations and Politics

Related Bills

  • S 119-2977: FAST Justice Act
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted