Legis Daily

Qualified Immunity Act of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-503| House 
| Updated: 1/16/2025
Virginia Foxx

Virginia Foxx

Republican Representative

North Carolina

Cosponsors (24)
Paul A. Gosar (Republican)Clay Higgins (Republican)Ashley Hinson (Republican)Andy Harris (Republican)Jefferson Van Drew (Republican)Mike Ezell (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Beth Van Duyne (Republican)Andrew R. Garbarino (Republican)Ken Calvert (Republican)Brian Jack (Republican)Daniel Meuser (Republican)Don Bacon (Republican)Jefferson Shreve (Republican)Mike Kelly (Republican)Brad Finstad (Republican)Troy E. Nehls (Republican)Austin Scott (Republican)Tony Gonzales (Republican)Mike Bost (Republican)Derrick Van Orden (Republican)Jay Obernolte (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)Nicole Malliotakis (Republican)

Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This bill, known as the Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 , seeks to amend Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes, codified as 42 U.S.C. 1983, to formally establish the defense of qualified immunity for law enforcement officers. The legislation aims to provide government officials with "breathing room" to make reasonable mistakes, balancing accountability with protection from undue liability when performing their duties. Under the proposed amendment, a law enforcement officer facing an action in their individual capacity would not be found liable if they can demonstrate that the constitutional or federal right was not clearly established at the time of the alleged deprivation. Alternatively, immunity would apply if a court of competent jurisdiction had issued a final, unreversed decision holding that the specific conduct alleged to be unlawful was consistent with the Constitution and federal laws. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that a law enforcement agency or unit of local government employing such an officer would also be shielded from liability if the officer is found not liable under these conditions and was acting within the scope of their employment. The legislation defines "law enforcement officer" broadly to include any federal, state, tribal, or local official with powers of arrest or apprehension, and "law enforcement agency" as any public agency engaged in law enforcement activities. These amendments are set to take effect 180 days after the bill's enactment.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-7951
Qualified Immunity Act of 2020

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-288
Qualified Immunity Act of 2021

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-233
Qualified Immunity Act of 2023
Jan 16, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-122
Introduced in Senate
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced in House
Jan 16, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-7951
    Qualified Immunity Act of 2020


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-288
    Qualified Immunity Act of 2021


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-233
    Qualified Immunity Act of 2023


  • January 16, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-122
    Introduced in Senate


  • January 16, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • January 16, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Related Bills

  • S 119-122: Qualified Immunity Act of 2025
Civil actions and liabilityConstitution and constitutional amendmentsDue process and equal protectionGovernment liabilityLaw enforcement officers

Qualified Immunity Act of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-503| House 
| Updated: 1/16/2025
This bill, known as the Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 , seeks to amend Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes, codified as 42 U.S.C. 1983, to formally establish the defense of qualified immunity for law enforcement officers. The legislation aims to provide government officials with "breathing room" to make reasonable mistakes, balancing accountability with protection from undue liability when performing their duties. Under the proposed amendment, a law enforcement officer facing an action in their individual capacity would not be found liable if they can demonstrate that the constitutional or federal right was not clearly established at the time of the alleged deprivation. Alternatively, immunity would apply if a court of competent jurisdiction had issued a final, unreversed decision holding that the specific conduct alleged to be unlawful was consistent with the Constitution and federal laws. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that a law enforcement agency or unit of local government employing such an officer would also be shielded from liability if the officer is found not liable under these conditions and was acting within the scope of their employment. The legislation defines "law enforcement officer" broadly to include any federal, state, tribal, or local official with powers of arrest or apprehension, and "law enforcement agency" as any public agency engaged in law enforcement activities. These amendments are set to take effect 180 days after the bill's enactment.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 116-7951
Qualified Immunity Act of 2020

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 117-288
Qualified Immunity Act of 2021

Bill from Previous Congress

HR 118-233
Qualified Immunity Act of 2023
Jan 16, 2025

Latest Companion Bill Action

S 119-122
Introduced in Senate
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced in House
Jan 16, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 116-7951
    Qualified Immunity Act of 2020


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 117-288
    Qualified Immunity Act of 2021


  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HR 118-233
    Qualified Immunity Act of 2023


  • January 16, 2025

    Latest Companion Bill Action

    S 119-122
    Introduced in Senate


  • January 16, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • January 16, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Virginia Foxx

Virginia Foxx

Republican Representative

North Carolina

Cosponsors (24)
Paul A. Gosar (Republican)Clay Higgins (Republican)Ashley Hinson (Republican)Andy Harris (Republican)Jefferson Van Drew (Republican)Mike Ezell (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Beth Van Duyne (Republican)Andrew R. Garbarino (Republican)Ken Calvert (Republican)Brian Jack (Republican)Daniel Meuser (Republican)Don Bacon (Republican)Jefferson Shreve (Republican)Mike Kelly (Republican)Brad Finstad (Republican)Troy E. Nehls (Republican)Austin Scott (Republican)Tony Gonzales (Republican)Mike Bost (Republican)Derrick Van Orden (Republican)Jay Obernolte (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)Nicole Malliotakis (Republican)

Judiciary Committee

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Related Bills

  • S 119-122: Qualified Immunity Act of 2025
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Civil actions and liabilityConstitution and constitutional amendmentsDue process and equal protectionGovernment liabilityLaw enforcement officers