Legis Daily

ROAD Act

USA119th CongressHR-4846| House 
| Updated: 8/1/2025
Randy Fine

Randy Fine

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (2)
Brandon Gill (Republican)W. Gregory Steube (Republican)

Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This bill amends title 18 of the United States Code to establish an affirmative defense in criminal or civil actions for damages related to motor vehicle incidents. This defense applies when the injury or damage was sustained by a participant acting in furtherance of a riot . To establish this defense, evidence must show the participant was convicted of a riot-related offense (section 2101), or the commission of such a crime must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. In civil actions where this affirmative defense is raised, the court is mandated to stay the proceedings during the pendency of any related criminal action that forms the basis for the defense. This stay is only lifted if the court determines that a conviction in the criminal case would not constitute a valid defense under this new provision.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Aug 1, 2025
Introduced in House
Aug 1, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • August 1, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • August 1, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Crime and Law Enforcement

ROAD Act

USA119th CongressHR-4846| House 
| Updated: 8/1/2025
This bill amends title 18 of the United States Code to establish an affirmative defense in criminal or civil actions for damages related to motor vehicle incidents. This defense applies when the injury or damage was sustained by a participant acting in furtherance of a riot . To establish this defense, evidence must show the participant was convicted of a riot-related offense (section 2101), or the commission of such a crime must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. In civil actions where this affirmative defense is raised, the court is mandated to stay the proceedings during the pendency of any related criminal action that forms the basis for the defense. This stay is only lifted if the court determines that a conviction in the criminal case would not constitute a valid defense under this new provision.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Aug 1, 2025
Introduced in House
Aug 1, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • August 1, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • August 1, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Randy Fine

Randy Fine

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (2)
Brandon Gill (Republican)W. Gregory Steube (Republican)

Judiciary Committee

Crime and Law Enforcement

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted