Legis Daily

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to establish a conclusive presumption that a State concurs to certain activities, and for other purposes.

USA119th CongressHR-1874| House 
| Updated: 3/6/2025
Kevin Kiley

Kevin Kiley

Republican Representative

California

Natural Resources Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This bill proposes amendments to the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, establishing a new mechanism for federal consistency review. It introduces a conclusive presumption that a coastal state concurs with various federal actions and federally-supported activities, thereby streamlining the approval process. This presumption applies to consistency determinations, federal agency findings, applicant certifications, and state or local government applications for federal assistance. The core of the amendment lies in defining " covered activities ," which trigger this presumption of concurrence. These include national security activities carried out by defense, homeland security, or intelligence agencies, and critical infrastructure projects related to planning, construction, or maintenance of essential infrastructure. Additionally, disaster recovery or mitigation activities , designed to prevent, respond to, or recover from emergencies, are covered. The presumption also extends to activities with a significant national or regional economic impact , specifically those in areas characterized by low per capita income or high unemployment rates. A crucial provision states that any objection or challenge by a coastal state to an activity under this conclusive presumption may not delay or otherwise prevent the activity from proceeding. The Secretary has a 30-day window to review and potentially nullify the presumption if an activity is found not to be "covered," otherwise, the presumption becomes final and binding.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Mar 5, 2025
Introduced in House
Mar 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Mar 6, 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1032-1033)
  • March 5, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • March 5, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.


  • March 6, 2025
    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1032-1033)

Public Lands and Natural Resources

Intergovernmental relationsMarine and coastal resources, fisheries

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to establish a conclusive presumption that a State concurs to certain activities, and for other purposes.

USA119th CongressHR-1874| House 
| Updated: 3/6/2025
This bill proposes amendments to the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, establishing a new mechanism for federal consistency review. It introduces a conclusive presumption that a coastal state concurs with various federal actions and federally-supported activities, thereby streamlining the approval process. This presumption applies to consistency determinations, federal agency findings, applicant certifications, and state or local government applications for federal assistance. The core of the amendment lies in defining " covered activities ," which trigger this presumption of concurrence. These include national security activities carried out by defense, homeland security, or intelligence agencies, and critical infrastructure projects related to planning, construction, or maintenance of essential infrastructure. Additionally, disaster recovery or mitigation activities , designed to prevent, respond to, or recover from emergencies, are covered. The presumption also extends to activities with a significant national or regional economic impact , specifically those in areas characterized by low per capita income or high unemployment rates. A crucial provision states that any objection or challenge by a coastal state to an activity under this conclusive presumption may not delay or otherwise prevent the activity from proceeding. The Secretary has a 30-day window to review and potentially nullify the presumption if an activity is found not to be "covered," otherwise, the presumption becomes final and binding.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Mar 5, 2025
Introduced in House
Mar 5, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Mar 6, 2025
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1032-1033)
  • March 5, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • March 5, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.


  • March 6, 2025
    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1032-1033)
Kevin Kiley

Kevin Kiley

Republican Representative

California

Natural Resources Committee

Public Lands and Natural Resources

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Intergovernmental relationsMarine and coastal resources, fisheries