Save Our Gas Stoves Act
USA118th CongressHR-1640| House
| Updated: 6/15/2023
Debbie Lesko
Republican Representative
Arizona
Cosponsors (63)
Matthew M. Rosendale (Republican)Diana Harshbarger (Republican)Chris Stewart (Republican)Bob Good (Republican)Paul A. Gosar (Republican)Michael C. Burgess (Republican)Ryan K. Zinke (Republican)Marc A. Veasey (Democratic)Tim Burchett (Republican)Mike Johnson (Republican)Guy Reschenthaler (Republican)Brett Guthrie (Republican)Rick W. Allen (Republican)Neal P. Dunn (Republican)Elijah Crane (Republican)Carlos A. Gimenez (Republican)Thomas P. Tiffany (Republican)Lance Gooden (Republican)Stephanie I. Bice (Republican)Mariannette Miller-Meeks (Republican)Beth Van Duyne (Republican)Andrew Ogles (Republican)David Rouzer (Republican)John R. Curtis (Republican)Andy Biggs (Republican)Jeff Duncan (Republican)Tim Walberg (Republican)Scott Perry (Republican)Dan Newhouse (Republican)Gus M. Bilirakis (Republican)Anna Paulina Luna (Republican)A. Drew Ferguson (Republican)Carol D. Miller (Republican)Joe Wilson (Republican)Mike D. Rogers (Republican)Richard Hudson (Republican)John Joyce (Republican)Kelly Armstrong (Republican)Glenn Grothman (Republican)John R. Moolenaar (Republican)Michael Cloud (Republican)Lauren Boebert (Republican)Henry Cuellar (Democratic)Larry Bucshon (Republican)Gary J. Palmer (Republican)Mary E. Miller (Republican)Russell Fry (Republican)Pete Stauber (Republican)James C. Moylan (Republican)Dan Crenshaw (Republican)Mary Sattler Peltola (Democratic)Juan Ciscomani (Republican)Kevin Kiley (Republican)Robert E. Latta (Republican)Randy K. Sr. Weber (Republican)Russ Fulcher (Republican)Greg Pence (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)Ralph Norman (Republican)Bill Johnson (Republican)Troy Balderson (Republican)Brian Babin (Republican)Eric Burlison (Republican)
Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Energy Subcommittee, Energy and Commerce Committee
- Introduced
- In Committee
- On Floor
- Passed Chamber
- Enacted
Save Our Gas Stoves Act This bill places limits on energy conservation standards for kitchen ranges or ovens under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The Department of the Energy (DOE) may not prescribe or amend energy conservation standards for kitchen ranges or ovens unless DOE (1) determines that such standards will not likely result in the unavailability of a product on account of the type of fuel the range or oven uses; and (2) discloses certain stakeholder meetings with entities that have ties to China or the Chinese Communist Party. In addition, DOE may not finalize, implement, or enforce the proposed rule titled Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Conventional Cooking Products issued on February 1, 2023, or any substantially similar rule. The proposed rule prescribes energy conservation standards for consumer conventional cooking tops, including electric cooking tops, gas cooking tops, electrical ovens, and gas ovens.
Suggested Questions
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate and Grid Security.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 10 .
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 31 - 18.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 63.
Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 118-86.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 463 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. R. 277 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 288 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 1615 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; and H. R. 1640 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate. One motion to recommit on each measure.
Rule H. Res. 463 failed passage of House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 495 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.
Rule H. Res. 495 passed House.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 495. (consideration: CR H2856-2865; text: CR H2862)
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Austin Scott to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 495 and Rule XVIII.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1640.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Huizenga amendment No. 1.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McGovern amendment No. 2.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McGovern amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pallone amendment No. 3.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Pallone amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Mrs. Lesko moved that the committee rise.
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1640 as unfinished business.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2922-2924)
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1640.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 249 - 181 (Roll no. 268).
View VoteMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Energy
Administrative law and regulatory proceduresConsumer affairsDepartment of EnergyEnergy efficiency and conservationOil and gas
Save Our Gas Stoves Act
USA118th CongressHR-1640| House
| Updated: 6/15/2023
Save Our Gas Stoves Act This bill places limits on energy conservation standards for kitchen ranges or ovens under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The Department of the Energy (DOE) may not prescribe or amend energy conservation standards for kitchen ranges or ovens unless DOE (1) determines that such standards will not likely result in the unavailability of a product on account of the type of fuel the range or oven uses; and (2) discloses certain stakeholder meetings with entities that have ties to China or the Chinese Communist Party. In addition, DOE may not finalize, implement, or enforce the proposed rule titled Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Conventional Cooking Products issued on February 1, 2023, or any substantially similar rule. The proposed rule prescribes energy conservation standards for consumer conventional cooking tops, including electric cooking tops, gas cooking tops, electrical ovens, and gas ovens.
Suggested Questions
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate and Grid Security.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 10 .
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 31 - 18.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 63.
Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 118-86.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 463 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. R. 277 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 288 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 1615 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; and H. R. 1640 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate. One motion to recommit on each measure.
Rule H. Res. 463 failed passage of House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 495 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.
Rule H. Res. 495 passed House.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 495. (consideration: CR H2856-2865; text: CR H2862)
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Austin Scott to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 495 and Rule XVIII.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1640.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Huizenga amendment No. 1.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McGovern amendment No. 2.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McGovern amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pallone amendment No. 3.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Pallone amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Mrs. Lesko moved that the committee rise.
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1640 as unfinished business.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2922-2924)
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1640.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 249 - 181 (Roll no. 268).
View VoteMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Debbie Lesko
Republican Representative
Arizona
Cosponsors (63)
Matthew M. Rosendale (Republican)Diana Harshbarger (Republican)Chris Stewart (Republican)Bob Good (Republican)Paul A. Gosar (Republican)Michael C. Burgess (Republican)Ryan K. Zinke (Republican)Marc A. Veasey (Democratic)Tim Burchett (Republican)Mike Johnson (Republican)Guy Reschenthaler (Republican)Brett Guthrie (Republican)Rick W. Allen (Republican)Neal P. Dunn (Republican)Elijah Crane (Republican)Carlos A. Gimenez (Republican)Thomas P. Tiffany (Republican)Lance Gooden (Republican)Stephanie I. Bice (Republican)Mariannette Miller-Meeks (Republican)Beth Van Duyne (Republican)Andrew Ogles (Republican)David Rouzer (Republican)John R. Curtis (Republican)Andy Biggs (Republican)Jeff Duncan (Republican)Tim Walberg (Republican)Scott Perry (Republican)Dan Newhouse (Republican)Gus M. Bilirakis (Republican)Anna Paulina Luna (Republican)A. Drew Ferguson (Republican)Carol D. Miller (Republican)Joe Wilson (Republican)Mike D. Rogers (Republican)Richard Hudson (Republican)John Joyce (Republican)Kelly Armstrong (Republican)Glenn Grothman (Republican)John R. Moolenaar (Republican)Michael Cloud (Republican)Lauren Boebert (Republican)Henry Cuellar (Democratic)Larry Bucshon (Republican)Gary J. Palmer (Republican)Mary E. Miller (Republican)Russell Fry (Republican)Pete Stauber (Republican)James C. Moylan (Republican)Dan Crenshaw (Republican)Mary Sattler Peltola (Democratic)Juan Ciscomani (Republican)Kevin Kiley (Republican)Robert E. Latta (Republican)Randy K. Sr. Weber (Republican)Russ Fulcher (Republican)Greg Pence (Republican)Michael Lawler (Republican)Ralph Norman (Republican)Bill Johnson (Republican)Troy Balderson (Republican)Brian Babin (Republican)Eric Burlison (Republican)
Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Energy Subcommittee, Energy and Commerce Committee
Energy
Related Bills
- HRES 118-495: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 44) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to "Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached 'stabilizing braces'"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 277) to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 288) to amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature of judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory provisions; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1615) to prohibit the use of Federal funds to ban gas stoves; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R 1640) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule titled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Conventional Cooking Products", and for other purposes.
- HRES 118-463: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 277) to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 288) to amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature of judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory provisions; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1615) to prohibit the use of Federal funds to ban gas stoves; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1640) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule titled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Conventional Cooking Products", and for other purposes.
- S 118-1859: Save Our Gas Stoves Act
- Introduced
- In Committee
- On Floor
- Passed Chamber
- Enacted
Administrative law and regulatory proceduresConsumer affairsDepartment of EnergyEnergy efficiency and conservationOil and gas