Legis Daily

Accessing America’s Critical Minerals Act of 2021

USA117th CongressHR-2604| House 
| Updated: 6/9/2021
Pete Stauber

Pete Stauber

Republican Representative

Minnesota

Cosponsors (25)
Matthew M. Rosendale (Republican)Doug LaMalfa (Republican)Chris Stewart (Republican)Bob Good (Republican)Paul A. Gosar (Republican)Adrian Smith (Republican)Yvette Herrell (Republican)Carlos A. Gimenez (Republican)Thomas P. Tiffany (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Mariannette Miller-Meeks (Republican)David B. McKinley (Republican)Dan Newhouse (Republican)Don Bacon (Republican)James R. Baird (Republican)Carol D. Miller (Republican)Kat Cammack (Republican)Kelly Armstrong (Republican)Glenn Grothman (Republican)Blake D. Moore (Republican)Bruce Westerman (Republican)Chris Jacobs (Republican)Mary E. Miller (Republican)Michael K. Simpson (Republican)Tom Emmer (Republican)

Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee, Small Business Committee, Natural Resources Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Accessing America's Critical Minerals Act of 2021 This bill establishes deadlines to complete the environmental review of critical mineral projects on federal land and sets forth related requirements to expedite the review of such projects under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). If an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement is required for such project, then all necessary federal review and permit considerations must be completed within 18 or 24 months, respectively. However, the review may exceed the time limit if the project sponsor agrees. The lead agency of the environmental review of such project must allow a state or local government, an Indian tribe, a project sponsor, or another appropriate entity to assume certain federal responsibilities regarding the environmental review of the project upon the request of such entity. Further, the bill authorizes a lead agency to determine that the requirements of NEPA have been satisfied if a state or federal agency acting under state or federal law has addressed specified factors, such as the environmental impact of the action to be conducted under the permit. If the lead agency does not make such a determination, then the agency must enter into an agreement with the project sponsor to set time limits for each part of the permitting process.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 15, 2021
Introduced in House
Apr 15, 2021
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jun 9, 2021
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
  • April 15, 2021
    Introduced in House


  • April 15, 2021
    Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


  • June 9, 2021
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

Energy

Related Bills

  • HR 117-2637: American Critical Mineral Independence Act of 2021
Environmental assessment, monitoring, researchGovernment information and archivesGovernment studies and investigationsIntergovernmental relationsLand use and conservationLicensing and registrationsMiningState and local government operationsStrategic materials and reserves

Accessing America’s Critical Minerals Act of 2021

USA117th CongressHR-2604| House 
| Updated: 6/9/2021
Accessing America's Critical Minerals Act of 2021 This bill establishes deadlines to complete the environmental review of critical mineral projects on federal land and sets forth related requirements to expedite the review of such projects under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). If an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement is required for such project, then all necessary federal review and permit considerations must be completed within 18 or 24 months, respectively. However, the review may exceed the time limit if the project sponsor agrees. The lead agency of the environmental review of such project must allow a state or local government, an Indian tribe, a project sponsor, or another appropriate entity to assume certain federal responsibilities regarding the environmental review of the project upon the request of such entity. Further, the bill authorizes a lead agency to determine that the requirements of NEPA have been satisfied if a state or federal agency acting under state or federal law has addressed specified factors, such as the environmental impact of the action to be conducted under the permit. If the lead agency does not make such a determination, then the agency must enter into an agreement with the project sponsor to set time limits for each part of the permitting process.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 15, 2021
Introduced in House
Apr 15, 2021
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jun 9, 2021
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
  • April 15, 2021
    Introduced in House


  • April 15, 2021
    Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


  • June 9, 2021
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
Pete Stauber

Pete Stauber

Republican Representative

Minnesota

Cosponsors (25)
Matthew M. Rosendale (Republican)Doug LaMalfa (Republican)Chris Stewart (Republican)Bob Good (Republican)Paul A. Gosar (Republican)Adrian Smith (Republican)Yvette Herrell (Republican)Carlos A. Gimenez (Republican)Thomas P. Tiffany (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Mariannette Miller-Meeks (Republican)David B. McKinley (Republican)Dan Newhouse (Republican)Don Bacon (Republican)James R. Baird (Republican)Carol D. Miller (Republican)Kat Cammack (Republican)Kelly Armstrong (Republican)Glenn Grothman (Republican)Blake D. Moore (Republican)Bruce Westerman (Republican)Chris Jacobs (Republican)Mary E. Miller (Republican)Michael K. Simpson (Republican)Tom Emmer (Republican)

Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee, Small Business Committee, Natural Resources Committee

Energy

Related Bills

  • HR 117-2637: American Critical Mineral Independence Act of 2021
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Environmental assessment, monitoring, researchGovernment information and archivesGovernment studies and investigationsIntergovernmental relationsLand use and conservationLicensing and registrationsMiningState and local government operationsStrategic materials and reserves