This resolution authorizes (1) Ariana Morales, an employee of the Office of Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, and any other current or former employee of the Senator's office from whom relevant evidence may be necessary, to testify in the case of State of Nevada v. Lacamera , except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted; and (2) the Senate Legal Counsel to represent Senator Cortez Masto and those employees in connection with this case.
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Introduced in Senate
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Introduced in Senate
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Congress
Congressional officers and employeesCriminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationEvidence and witnessesLegislative rules and procedureMembers of CongressNevadaSenate
A resolution to authorize testimony and representation in State of Nevada v. Lacamera.
USA116th CongressSRES-192| Senate
| Updated: 5/7/2019
This resolution authorizes (1) Ariana Morales, an employee of the Office of Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, and any other current or former employee of the Senator's office from whom relevant evidence may be necessary, to testify in the case of State of Nevada v. Lacamera , except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted; and (2) the Senate Legal Counsel to represent Senator Cortez Masto and those employees in connection with this case.
Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better
Timeline
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Introduced in Senate
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Introduced in Senate
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
Congressional officers and employeesCriminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationEvidence and witnessesLegislative rules and procedureMembers of CongressNevadaSenate