Legis Daily

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.

USA116th CongressHCONRES-11| House 
| Updated: 1/30/2019
Marcy Kaptur

Marcy Kaptur

Democratic Representative

Ohio

Cosponsors (3)
Brian Higgins (Democratic)Eleanor Holmes Norton (Democratic)Janice D. Schakowsky (Democratic)

Judiciary Committee, Constitution and Limited Government Subcommittee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment when rendering its decision in Buckley v. Valeo (which held limits on election spending to be unconstitutional).
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HCONRES 115-42
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.
Jan 30, 2019
Introduced in House
Jan 30, 2019
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 30, 2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Jan 30, 2019
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E114)

  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HCONRES 115-42
    Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.
  • January 30, 2019
    Introduced in House
  • January 30, 2019
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • January 30, 2019
    Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
  • January 30, 2019
    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E114)

Government Operations and Politics

Constitution and constitutional amendmentsElections, voting, political campaign regulationFirst Amendment rightsSupreme Court

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.

USA116th CongressHCONRES-11| House 
| Updated: 1/30/2019
This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment when rendering its decision in Buckley v. Valeo (which held limits on election spending to be unconstitutional).
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline

Bill from Previous Congress

HCONRES 115-42
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.
Jan 30, 2019
Introduced in House
Jan 30, 2019
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 30, 2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Jan 30, 2019
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E114)

  • Bill from Previous Congress

    HCONRES 115-42
    Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.
  • January 30, 2019
    Introduced in House
  • January 30, 2019
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  • January 30, 2019
    Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
  • January 30, 2019
    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E114)
Marcy Kaptur

Marcy Kaptur

Democratic Representative

Ohio

Cosponsors (3)
Brian Higgins (Democratic)Eleanor Holmes Norton (Democratic)Janice D. Schakowsky (Democratic)

Judiciary Committee, Constitution and Limited Government Subcommittee

Government Operations and Politics

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Constitution and constitutional amendmentsElections, voting, political campaign regulationFirst Amendment rightsSupreme Court