Legis Daily

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the justices of the United States Supreme Court should make themselves subject to the existing and operative ethics guidelines set out in the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, or should promulgate their own code of conduct.

USA115th CongressHRES-568| House 
| Updated: 10/16/2017
Eleanor Holmes Norton

Eleanor Holmes Norton

Democratic Representative

District of Columbia

Cosponsors (1)
Jamie Raskin (Democratic)

Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet Subcommittee, Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the Justices of the Supreme Court should subject themselves to the ethics guidelines set out in the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges or promulgate their own code of conduct.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Oct 11, 2017
Introduced in House
Oct 11, 2017
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Oct 16, 2017
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
  • October 11, 2017
    Introduced in House


  • October 11, 2017
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • October 16, 2017
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.

Law

Government ethics and transparency, public corruptionJudgesSupreme Court

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the justices of the United States Supreme Court should make themselves subject to the existing and operative ethics guidelines set out in the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, or should promulgate their own code of conduct.

USA115th CongressHRES-568| House 
| Updated: 10/16/2017
Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the Justices of the Supreme Court should subject themselves to the ethics guidelines set out in the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges or promulgate their own code of conduct.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Oct 11, 2017
Introduced in House
Oct 11, 2017
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Oct 16, 2017
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
  • October 11, 2017
    Introduced in House


  • October 11, 2017
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • October 16, 2017
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
Eleanor Holmes Norton

Eleanor Holmes Norton

Democratic Representative

District of Columbia

Cosponsors (1)
Jamie Raskin (Democratic)

Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet Subcommittee, Judiciary Committee

Law

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Government ethics and transparency, public corruptionJudgesSupreme Court