Legis Daily

To amend the Clayton Act with respect to mergers.

USA115th CongressHR-5642| House 
| Updated: 5/22/2018
Jerrold Nadler

Jerrold Nadler

Democratic Representative

New York

Cosponsors (3)
David N. Cicilline (Democratic)Keith Ellison (Democratic)Joseph Crowley (Democratic)

Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust Subcommittee, Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Restoring and Improving Merger Enforcement Act of 2018 This bill revises the standard for determining whether a proposed corporate acquisition would substantially lessen competition. Specifically, the bill establishes that a court may consider a claim that the acquisition would increase efficiency only if such increased efficiency (1) is verifiable, (2) could not be accomplished without the acquisition, and (3) would promote competition. The bill also places the burden of proof on the defendant claiming that increased efficiency will eliminate the substantial lessening of competition that would result from the proposed acquisition.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 26, 2018
Introduced in House
Apr 26, 2018
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
May 22, 2018
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
  • April 26, 2018
    Introduced in House


  • April 26, 2018
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • May 22, 2018
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.

Commerce

Business recordsCompetition and antitrustConsumer affairsCorporate finance and managementJudicial review and appeals

To amend the Clayton Act with respect to mergers.

USA115th CongressHR-5642| House 
| Updated: 5/22/2018
Restoring and Improving Merger Enforcement Act of 2018 This bill revises the standard for determining whether a proposed corporate acquisition would substantially lessen competition. Specifically, the bill establishes that a court may consider a claim that the acquisition would increase efficiency only if such increased efficiency (1) is verifiable, (2) could not be accomplished without the acquisition, and (3) would promote competition. The bill also places the burden of proof on the defendant claiming that increased efficiency will eliminate the substantial lessening of competition that would result from the proposed acquisition.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Apr 26, 2018
Introduced in House
Apr 26, 2018
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
May 22, 2018
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
  • April 26, 2018
    Introduced in House


  • April 26, 2018
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • May 22, 2018
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Jerrold Nadler

Jerrold Nadler

Democratic Representative

New York

Cosponsors (3)
David N. Cicilline (Democratic)Keith Ellison (Democratic)Joseph Crowley (Democratic)

Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust Subcommittee, Judiciary Committee

Commerce

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Business recordsCompetition and antitrustConsumer affairsCorporate finance and managementJudicial review and appeals