Legis Daily

To protect cyber privacy, and for other purposes.

USA115th CongressHR-135| House 
| Updated: 1/12/2017
John Conyers

John Conyers

Democratic Representative

Michigan

Cosponsors (1)
Henry C. "Hank" Johnson (Democratic)

Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust Subcommittee, Crime and Federal Government Surveillance Subcommittee, Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Cyber Privacy Fortification Act of 2017 This bill amends the federal criminal code to provide criminal penalties for intentional failures to provide required notices regarding security breaches of computerized data that there is reason to believe resulted in improper access to specified sensitive personally identifiable information that is electronic or digital. A person who owns or possesses data in electronic form containing a means of identification, and who has knowledge of a major security breach of the system containing such data, must notify the U.S. Secret Service or the Federal Bureau of Investigation. A "major security breach" involves: (1) a means of identification pertaining to at least 10,000 individuals that is reasonably believed to have been acquired, (2) databases owned by the federal government, or (3) a means of identification of federal employees or contractors involved in national security matters or law enforcement. The Department of Justice and state attorneys general may bring civil actions and obtain injunctive relief for violations of federal laws relating to data security. Federal agencies must prepare and make available to the public privacy impact assessments that describe the impact of certain proposed and final agency rules on the privacy of individuals. Agencies may waive or delay certain privacy impact assessment requirements for emergencies and national security reasons. Federal agencies must: (1) periodically review promulgated rules that have a significant privacy impact on individuals or a privacy impact on a substantial number of individuals, and (2) consider whether each such rule can be amended or rescinded in a manner that minimizes any such impact while remaining in accordance with applicable statutes. The bill provides access to judicial review to individuals adversely affected or aggrieved by final agency action on any such rule.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Jan 3, 2017
Introduced in House
Jan 3, 2017
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 12, 2017
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Jan 12, 2017
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
  • January 3, 2017
    Introduced in House


  • January 3, 2017
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • January 12, 2017
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.


  • January 12, 2017
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.

Science, Technology, Communications

Administrative law and regulatory proceduresBusiness recordsCivil actions and liabilityComputers and information technologyComputer security and identity theftCongressional oversightConsumer affairsConsumer creditCriminal justice information and recordsGovernment information and archivesHealth information and medical recordsJudicial review and appealsRight of privacy

To protect cyber privacy, and for other purposes.

USA115th CongressHR-135| House 
| Updated: 1/12/2017
Cyber Privacy Fortification Act of 2017 This bill amends the federal criminal code to provide criminal penalties for intentional failures to provide required notices regarding security breaches of computerized data that there is reason to believe resulted in improper access to specified sensitive personally identifiable information that is electronic or digital. A person who owns or possesses data in electronic form containing a means of identification, and who has knowledge of a major security breach of the system containing such data, must notify the U.S. Secret Service or the Federal Bureau of Investigation. A "major security breach" involves: (1) a means of identification pertaining to at least 10,000 individuals that is reasonably believed to have been acquired, (2) databases owned by the federal government, or (3) a means of identification of federal employees or contractors involved in national security matters or law enforcement. The Department of Justice and state attorneys general may bring civil actions and obtain injunctive relief for violations of federal laws relating to data security. Federal agencies must prepare and make available to the public privacy impact assessments that describe the impact of certain proposed and final agency rules on the privacy of individuals. Agencies may waive or delay certain privacy impact assessment requirements for emergencies and national security reasons. Federal agencies must: (1) periodically review promulgated rules that have a significant privacy impact on individuals or a privacy impact on a substantial number of individuals, and (2) consider whether each such rule can be amended or rescinded in a manner that minimizes any such impact while remaining in accordance with applicable statutes. The bill provides access to judicial review to individuals adversely affected or aggrieved by final agency action on any such rule.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Jan 3, 2017
Introduced in House
Jan 3, 2017
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 12, 2017
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Jan 12, 2017
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
  • January 3, 2017
    Introduced in House


  • January 3, 2017
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • January 12, 2017
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.


  • January 12, 2017
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
John Conyers

John Conyers

Democratic Representative

Michigan

Cosponsors (1)
Henry C. "Hank" Johnson (Democratic)

Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust Subcommittee, Crime and Federal Government Surveillance Subcommittee, Judiciary Committee

Science, Technology, Communications

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Administrative law and regulatory proceduresBusiness recordsCivil actions and liabilityComputers and information technologyComputer security and identity theftCongressional oversightConsumer affairsConsumer creditCriminal justice information and recordsGovernment information and archivesHealth information and medical recordsJudicial review and appealsRight of privacy